Victor's Dichotomy In Frankenstein

1180 Words5 Pages
Throughout the novel Frankenstein, the actions of Victor Frankenstein’s monster lucidly consume and destroy not only him, but everyone with relations to him as well. With this in mind, it seems almost certain that the responsibility of the deaths of many, all of which were directly affiliated with the monster’s objective of impairing Victor’s mental well-being, could justifiably be placed upon the monster. Evidently yes, as the creation himself is guilty of directly murdering Victor Frankenstein’s brother William, his wife Elizabeth, his best friend Henry Clerval, and, indirectly, his family friend Justine, his father Alphonse, and even Victor himself. While we are irrefutably aware that the monster was the cause of these murders, the pressing…show more content…
“I could have torn him limb from limb, as the lion rends the antelope. But my heart sank within me as with bitter sickness, and I refrained.” In essence, he could have “torn him limb from limb”, but he was too disheartened to wrongfully hurt another human because he knew it was irrational and uncharacteristic of a human. Further proving his sanity and viability, aside from the Delacey confrontation, the monster knew to remain in solitude, and cover up his tracks, after killing his unsuspecting victims. Not only does this provide him with safety from the consequences he should be entailed to serve, but it also presents a chance to emotionally damage Victor, and, in a few cases, frame him. It would seem as though a mentally unstable being would not possess such intuition to frame another man, or escape from the law himself. Now in this very trial he additionally proved his sanity by pleading insane, his only opportunity to once again avoid the ramifications of his crime. Before the monster was escaping the law through hiding, now he is attempting to escape the law through duping our jury into believing he is insane, a fluke that cannot be
Open Document