Victim Precipitation Essay

321 Words2 Pages
The difference between victim precipitation and victim blaming is victim precipitation typically involves an explanation of how an individual's behavior may contribute to his or her own victimization. Victim Blaming usually occurs when the victim of a crime or any wrongful act is held entirely or partially responsible for the harm that they were endured. Victim precipitation can be active or passive. Active precipitation can occur when victims act proactively, use threats, fighting words, or even attack first. Routine activity theory plays a role in victim precipitation on the basis that the explanation needed to determine how a person was victimized could be something that they've done on a routinely basis. Routine activity theory suggests that crime occurs when a motivated offender, a suitable target, and lack of capable guardian converge in the the same place at the same time. By being a victim of a crime could be explained by examining routine activities that could have made a person become a target for a criminal. Examples of routine activities could be traveling to and from work the same route everyday and when you shop. How the offender rational choice theory could conflict with routine activity theory is by one theory(Routine activity) analyzes the criminal event and simply avoids other potential motivations and the psychology aspects for reasoning behind the criminal act. Rational choice theory approaches crime as purposive behavior designed to meet the offender's commonplace needs such as money, status, sex, and excitement. Meeting these needs involve making decisions and rational choices. It also emphasizes on the offender having the role of an enlightened self-interest individual decision making process. In the Rational choice theory people are viewed as adding up the benefits and the costs of various courses of actions. Patterns of behavior in

More about Victim Precipitation Essay

Open Document