Chandra Lauderdale Short Paper 1 Govt. 2302 The main purpose of this chapter is to trace the expansion of presidential responsibilities and power, identify the many roles Presidents play, the functions filled by the President’s many advisers and helpers, the conflict between Presidents and Congress, and assesses how democratic the presidency is and whether presidents Respond to the public. The key questions that the author is addressing are, Does it strike you as odd that an era that produced some of our most respected presidents was in fact a time Of congressional dominance? Are there adequate checks in place
The executive branch is vested in the President of the United States. The president is responsible to enforce laws that will help not only his political party but also the constituents of the United States. The presidents has a political party it might be the majority or the minority but the president will always want
History essay * Presidents have become more powerful over time If you do win, the power rush is huge. The President of the United States is certainly the most powerful person in the world—but, interestingly, the Constitution's drafters did not expect this to be the case. In fact, James Madison, the Constitution's principal architect, worried that the "balance of powers" tilted toward the House of Representatives. Madison believed that its control over taxes and spending and its ability to make laws that narrowed the powers of the executive and the judiciary made the legislative branch the real center of national power. But from the start, presidents worked to protect and expand their turf—and they generally succeeded.
In a nutshell, this epitomizes how corporate capitalism has become hopelessly intertwined with democracy to the point that it is difficult to approximate where one ends and the other begins. In conclusion serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. Our founding fathers envisioned citizen legislators who under the obligation of civic duty were given the opportunity to serve their countrymen and when their term was up they returned home. This ideal seems quaint when compared with current day career politicians who do nothing but lower Americans faith in the ability of their own government by way of endless scandals and investigations. The machinery of corruption can be overhauled within congress but that entails changing long held fundamental concepts as to who “we the people” truly means.
Second, it discusses his role as a Modern American President and the changes Truman made to the office. Specifically, it examines his personality qualities such as the ability to make a decision and stand by it. In addition, Ferrell discusses how Truman has been misjudged throughout history. Ferrell contends that Truman is deserving of more credit and respect by historians and the public. The book is well balanced from describing the
l. Explain the primary reason the president tends to have an advantage over Congress in gaining media attention. m. Consider the table above. * Describe the difference in the viewing patterns of older and younger age-groups. * Describe the change from 1974 to 2002 in viewing habits that exists for all age categories. n. Given the information in the table, describe one implication for presidents in their use of the media to promote their political and policy objectives to the American public.
b) Using your own knowledge as well as the extract, explain why recent reforms can be said to have made the House of Lords more legitimate. Recent reforms have made the House of Lords more legitimate, the 2001 reforms made by Blair’s government meant that that most hereditary peers were no longer part of the Lords – this meant that the people in the Lords were not their because of their blood but because of their expertise and interest in subjects relating to discussing inside the chamber. Blair, by removing hereditary peers made the Lords more accountable and more professional. The Lords become a real discussion based chamber with key figures from around the country invited to discuss and debate topics which meant something to them. However, the Lords have always had a strong hold on the Commons, overriding them more times than the government’s own backbenchers.
Lobbying in America Lobbying has long been a topic of controversy since the dawn of our political system. Some see it as a necessary means to petition the government while others claim it is a mere mask for bribery. The former opinion has stood the test of time and proved that despite episodes of scandal, lobbying has promoted vital legislation and is a constitutional right every free individual should be able to practice. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines lobbying as a form of advocacy with the intention of influencing decisions made by the government, by individuals or by specialized lobby groups; it includes all attempts to influence legislators and officials, whether by other legislators, constituents or organized groups. The word
The President has many roles official roles that are outlined in the constitution. One of these roles is the Chief Legislator. It is the president’s job to shape policy, in other words, the president is the head lobbyist. To pass laws, the president can request or insist that congress enact laws that he thinks will benefit the American people. Because the American people blame the president for any problems, the president feels especially obligated to pass laws through congress.
The House Rules Committee is a very important body of the United States Congress and helps promote the efficiency of the legislature in its everyday workings. Some of the responsibilities of the House Rules Committee include: set the amount of time a bill will be considered in the House, and determine whether amendments can be offered and under what conditions. This allows the House Rules Committee to have a lot of power and some may feel that the power may be too much. The House Rules Committee is comprised of nine members of the majority party and four members of the minority party. I believe the House Rules Committee has too much power and exceedingly boosts the majority party.