Support your ideas with evidence from the story. In the third paragraph, introduce the second scientist you will discuss. Tell what he or she did and explain why this scientist was or was not the kind of “great person” that Longfellow admired. Support your ideas with evidence from the story. In the final paragraph, discuss how you might choose to emulate these scientists in your own life.
Write a paragraph about each scientist. Tell me what kind of science they practiced, what discoveries or innovations they are famous for. How have these innovations affected you, your family or society? Also tell me what kind of scientist would you like to be if you were to choose a career in science and why? This is your first real writing assignment in the course.
Casper 1. What are Aristotle’s three genres of rhetoric and what kinds of writing in the discourse of scientists do they pick out? * Epideictic Rhetoric, deliberative (review article, define and further research), forensic (like scientific reports, experiment and interpretation) * Epideictic rhetoric in science has been less explored 2. What are the five general types of statement in science that Casper uses in his study of Nobel lectures? - conjecture or speculate type 1, claims not widely accepted with modalities type 2, accepted knowledge with modalities, common accepted knowledge type 4, taken-for-granted facts type 5 3.
Essay 2 Lesson 1, question 3: Summarize the criteria of a hypothesis-based scientific study. How is this technique similar to and different from the solving of everyday problems? Research and describe an experiment of your choice that demonstrates the basic considerations that must be taken in the design of a good, hypothesis-based, scientific experiment. The criteria for a hypothesis-based scientific study are first, coming up with a study that can be tested or falsifiable. There must be criteria to go by that can prove whether the study is true or false.
. What are the conclusions? You stated this in the sentence above. Note Card 2: Weisstein, N. (1993). Psychology constructs the female: Or he fantasy life of the male psychologist with some attention to the fantasies of his friends, the male biologist and the male anthropologist).
The Scientific Method Axia College SCI/230 Have you ever asked your-self a question that sparked your imagination to try to find the answer for yourself? Did you find that answer by trying different options to achieve the answer? If you have then you have used the Scientific Method. The Scientific Method is a system made up of six steps that scientists have use for centuries to solve some of life’s biggest mysteries as well as everyday ponders. This writer is going to show you an example of the everyday questions that we may use the Scientific Method for as well as an experiment so that you may use it knowingly also.
3) Name one to three important theorists associated with biological psychology. Among the many theorists associated with biological psychology listed in Biopsychology by Pinel are three theorists of note. Those theorists are Charles Darwin, René Descartes, and Donald O. Hebb. Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution plays a vital role in illustrating the interlacing aspects between biology and psychology. René Descartes’ dualism theory enabled the advancement of medical science that had been hindered by the Church up until that point.
The final step was focused on finding the best way to assess the professor’s students on their fulfillment of course objectives. Session two and three involved reviewing the deliverables of both students and the professor. Powers helped her improve her PowerPoint presentations by having her define her content, with which he used to create visual depictions (e.g. diagrams and charts) to reinforce learning. In session three, the professor concluded that four assignments were crucial to assessing student learning: in-class participation, an individual midterm, group presentation, and an individual reflection assignment.
The online open source encyclopedia Wikipedia has become a serious controversial issue in the academic world. Educators all over the world are perplexed at the idea that students should be able to use Wikipedia as a credible source. Two college professors wrote two essays with completely different view points on the issue. On the side against using Wikipedia as a scholarly source is Professor Neil L. Waters with his article “Why You Can’t Cite Wikipedia in My Class.” Then on the opposing side of the argument is Professor Mark A. Wilson with his article “Professors Should Embrace Wikipedia”. Both Waters and Wilson made some convincing points but Waters came out on top with better more convincing factual information to persuade the readers the downfalls
Another extremely important course I took was Clinical Psychology. In this class I learned about theoretical models, clinical assessment, multicultural considerations, and different types of therapeutic approaches. For the final project, students were asked to create their own model of personality and therapeutic approach, and then develop three possible treatment plans based on the model. I spent many hours working on this project and did a huge amount of research on all the different theories and therapeutic approaches before coming up with my own model. When some of my classmates told me that it took them only a couple of hours to complete this assignment and that the textbook provided them with all the necessary information, that’s when I realized how strong my desire to become a therapist is.