What I think should have happened would be for her to privately E-mail him voicing her concerns with his letter to her and explaining how and why it upset her. This would have avoided the public
By doing this, the reader gains a connection with Jennifer and helps them understand her motivation for her actions. This also helps Silvers arguments later on, using Jennifer’s story as a reference or an example as to why cloning is acceptable. “Narcissus Cloned” however, begins by stating Washington D.C’s concerns with the “ethical issues” and “moral values” that cloning with cause in society. Just from the beginning of both pieces, the reader can already see the bias of both authors, Silver being for cloning and Conley being strongly against it. Both Silver and Conley also disagree on the value of a cloned person’s life.
However, marriage counseling should be required for a couple filing divorce because it allows both sides to communicate with a professional which lets them understand from a different outlook, couples with children get a chance to really think about how it will affect their entire family, and even if it doesn’t help save the marriage it can still end things on a better note or show the two how to be on good terms if children are involved. Speaking with a marriage counselor can benefit unsteady marriages by showing them to talk to each other in a calm manner and listen and understand each other thoroughly. If they cooperate properly, they can easily state their opinions on certain issues without having anger towards one another. Doing such small tasks can make an impact on how a couple communicates. People in general have a hard time talking with others, and don’t see right from wrong until told by someone looking at it from a different point of view.
There are many different types of communication styles each person has a unique personality and communication style which plays a basic role in their personality perspectives. In the article “but what do you mean?” by Deborah Tannen the author argues that there is no right or wrong way to talk. Whereas in the article “Doublespeak” by William Lutz he argues that communication is carefully designed and constructed to mislead and corrupt our thoughts. However I agree with Tanner because men and women talk differently. One of the most common reasons is that your communication style is different than the other person’s communication style.
The author is trying to get people to put their character ethics into perspective by introducing, in laymen’s terms, the foundations and skills which will help to build these characters but without the religious interventions. The overview of the book tries to prepare you so that when you get to the first habit, you will have a better understanding of how the habits came about. It explains the differences of the personality ethics most people possess today instead of the character ethics we were born with. It starts with some common problems that most people can relate to. Then it goes through the history of character ethics and how society seemed to have lost these ethics to personality ethics.
It is best to use details and examples that are not only relevant to the topic, but also understandable to your audience. Your reader will lose interest if you go beyond their level of understanding, and if you explain too much. When writing you have to find the middle way, and you achieve this by using enough detail to be clear but not saturate the point. More than that when you use too much detail your tone can sometimes seem condescending to your reader, and this will also make them lose interest in your writing. You need to be consistently mindful of how you are presenting your ideas, and be sure that you are leaving your biases and emotions out of the writing.
This promotes a social withdrawal, but grievances have not yet been aired. If the threshold is reached, the individual will believe that they will be justified in withdrawing. The next stage is the dyadic process, where the individual declares their resentment for their partner, and the problems are aired and disputed by their partner. The relationship can be saves by effective communication. However, is can also highlight the weaknesses.
Perhaps another student provoked me to behave improperly, but I realize I have alternatives. I am the one who was hurt by my behavior and I should not let another person annoy me to the point that I would get myself in trouble. Problems with other students can be avoided by thinking clearly and showing a mature attitude. I also have teachers and counselors who are ready to help if there is a situation I cannot handle alone. I know that many times people who say they are my friends will encourage me to do something that could mean trouble later.
For the victim closure can come in two forms. The first comes through the victim being able to say everything that they have wanted to say to the offender in hopes of receiving an apology. The second form occurs when they receive an apology from the offender. This apology lets the victim know that the offender feels remorse for what they have done and that they are sorry for committing the crime. You can see how the first form of closure can lead to the second, however, just because the victim gets to say what they want to say does not mean that they will receive an apology.
Heather stated that I do allow those I am more unfamiliar with to complete their thoughts prior to responding to what they had to say. However I am more likely to cut the speaker off the more familiar I am with them. When asked if I suspend judgment until I have heard the entire story, She answered with a resounding NO. When asked if I ask questions for clarity, she said that I almost always ask appropriate questions at the appropriate time and give the speaker the sense that I am listening and genuinely care. When asked if I exhibit positive body language, she said yes.