The company has been affected in a good way because this act allows the company to have the right to sell their products and services. Which allows the business to keep running and trading. * Consumer protection from unfair trading. This law is in place to prevent traders are honest and fair when offering their products and services for sale. Examples of how business have been affected by consumer protection from unfair trading- 1.
This practice also violated the loyalty Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. 3、 Sherman accepted compensation from the competitive company, this practice violated the additional compensation arrangement Code of Ethics and Standards of Professional Conduct. Some ways could use to prevent the violations: 1、 Require employees signed some confidential agreement and competition restriction agreement. 2、 To build customer management system, it can be prevent the customer’s information was leaked and occupied. 3、 To increase employees who violated company contract and punished to legal.
People who stand to suffer economic loss should allocate the risk within their contracts effectively with property owners Argument assumes that all persons organise affairs in accordance with laws of economic efficiency, assigning liability to the ‘least-cost risk avoider’ Not all parties to a transaction share an equality of bargaining power 2. Donoghue v Stevenson: Lord Reid Hedley Byrne: the difference between negligent acts and words: people often express definite opinions on social or informal occasions even when they see that others may be influenced by them; they do it without taking that care which they would take if asked
The Case of Business Law-Molly Case Tort law: Part 1 : We will begin with the liability of what Air transport Limited should hold. Firstly, the company would be accused of deceiving the customer. A tort arises when a party suffers damages by acting upon a false representation made by a party with the intention of deceiving the other. The owner lied intentionally to Molly that they had won a lot of awards for the quality of their delivery service, which he did not. Afterwards, Molly signed the contract and claimed very clearly about the the condition of the equipment and warned the Air transport Limited to protect it as careful as they can.
In business when a customer won’t pay a bill for services rendered or in a family situation where marriage is being questioned as valid or not, or with the rules of divorce or who should have the care of the children. With the accusation of unlawful conduct it means someone is thought to be at fault, although the person is innocent until proven otherwise. In civil law, terms such as ‘reasonable care’ and ‘reasonably foresee’ (Arthur, 2011) are used, this says that occurrences shouldn’t happen if the proper measures are in place. The person raising the grievance should make sure they have followed policy and procedure to reasonably protect them from harm. In criminal law, the actus reus, or translated, the guilty act, has to be committed voluntarily.
In addition, “consumers have the basic right to be protected from the loss or injury caused on account of defective goods”. This becomes an ethical issue when Consolidated did not inform consumers because of fear of losing the contract or in other words, “profit” all while knowingly putting the lives of others at risk is morally and ethically wrong. (Schooling) For this issue as a resolution, lives should not have been placed at risk in the first place. A product recall should have been done to replace the flak jacket before anything occurred. This would have caused some negative media but in the long run Consolidated would have been
| LAW AND ORDER 1) Title: The Case of the Conflicted Prosecutor 7/14/2008 Source: Media 2) Facts: * He lost their trial on purpose, in the interest of justice (Bibb) * The job of determining which side prevails belongs to judge and jury * Lawyers have an ethical duty to represent their clients’ interests see them, not as the lawyers would like them to be. 3) Opinions: * Bibb’s ethical principle- Prosecutors are charged with seeing that justices is done, not just winning the case. * Bibb’s rationalization principle- If Bibb had refused to accept the case, another prosecutor would have taken over, and might have won a conviction. * He (Bibb) did not think that justice was certain enough to occur without his help, so he violated his oath and his professional standards to get the imprisoned men exonerated. 4) Materials in the article and the text: The article raises the question of “Was Bibb ethical?” He also came forward and admitted to throwing the 2005 re-trial of the two men that were convicted.
Making an assessment of these “not so clear cut” or difficult cases may discourage a lawyer from pursuing them and he might end up deciding that they are not worth the trouble at all. In my opinion, however, there exists a moral and ethical obligation on the part of any lawyer to represent clients who seeks legal counsel, even when there is an issue of ethics, legality, or when the odds of winning a case seem nil at best. Let us take, for example, the case of a client who comes to a lawyer with a problem where he has done some “under the table” work for a company and he is owed a lot of money for said work. Should the fact that he has been working “under the table” to avoid paying taxes deny him his right to collect the money he has rightfully earned? Is he solely to blame for trying to avoid paying his share of taxes or should the company that hired him also share some of the responsibility?
Why do people want to come here to live illegally, from one place to the next, work in low wages, never dare to show off their face anywhere because they’re afraid that they would get caught and deport back from wherever? Why would they want to leave their country, the place where they grew up, know the language, culture, and have all their relatives there? If there isn’t anything wrong, then such thing would not have happened already. They leave their country, come to a strange land, live illegally because back home, they cannot make a living. They come here to hope for a better life, or simply just a survival chance.
Second of all, he took with him different folders (marketing presentations, computer programs, research material, etc. ), which can be assimilated to intangible assets for Pearl. These actions would definitely harm Pearl, by depriving it of their skills and assets and divulging confidential information. How to prevent this: In order to prevent employees from divulging private information, the funds should ask their employees to sign contracts related to the “non-disclosure of private information”, especially towards competitors. As a result, they would be able to punish employees who did not keep their engagement.