Not in all situations because the body mikes could be detected and then your cover would be blown. It would work for long-term case but not for a deep undercover job. Should undercover officers be allowed to break minor laws to obtain the confidence of the targets? Yes, how crazy this might sound but this is for them to get a case going and catch the criminals. If you want to catch them you must play by their rules considering drugs, alcohol, money etc… It’s all part of the game and your job.
Many people in our nation today think that the polity on gun control is not strict enough. People all around the country are obsessed with the idea that everyone who is armed has the intention to threaten or injure others. The need to grant ownership of a weapon to an individual is often argued as unimportant. As bad as it may sound, many gun owners in fact hope that they meet a situation in which they are permitted to use their firearm for its specified use. The term “self-defense” is a very touchy subject and cannot be taken
Along with this feeling of power he might have had a life style that needed a more luxuries accommodation. However, to the surprise of Gonzales himself, the secret service was on point with investigating him, as they might have suspected him of tipping off other criminals the secret service was investigating. Some companies opt not to prosecute white collar criminals simply because it might cost too much to go after a criminal, and it also might be difficult to prove the wrong doing. Some criminals might hide behind the misjudgment theory and battle their way out of court. The problem with not prosecuting white collar criminals is that they might continue to commit their crimes, thus continuously affecting society.
I feel as if the US needs to be more careful with their way of getting such law enforcement officers. Not that their way of selecting officers in today’s world isn’t enough there just needs to be more added to it. In conclusion the movie “US Marshals” conveys multiple levels of criminal behavior. Not only from a criminal running away from law enforcement but rogue cops also committing criminal acts. Before anyone is sent to jail and there is suspicion about the case their needs to be detective work done so that the system doesn’t make the wrong
Try the questions below. It is fine if you feel that you are not up to my mark, some do and that’s why they are working for me. I don’t sacked workers unless they do something stupid like stealing from me. I will push the police all the way to ensure that you go to court. So think about it before you try or are tempted to do so.
The job of law enforcement personnel can be dangerous depending on the position you hold, it’s important that there are guidelines in the different aspects of working conditions or hazards you may encounter. As I move forward with my education I want to make sure I keep safety in mind when I choose my career. If I end up working in an office setting and not in the field, I will encounter fewer hazards. If I go into forensic psychology I am told I could be dealing directly with criminals, going into correctional facilities to interview criminals so extra precaution should be taken to make sure I am protecting myself and I am aware of my surroundings. If I end up being a criminalist, I would be using chemicals that could be dangerous so knowing how to avoid the possible hazard is important.
The lead profiler on any case can be someone from within or outside the department depending on the skill levels available internally and preferably, a teamwork approach to case analysis would create a continuing dialogue that would not entirely hinge on the opinion of one investigator or profiler. While it is desirable to narrow the suspect list down to a workable size for the investigators, it is also necessary to prevent personal whims from causing tunnel vision and causing the exclusion of viable suspects. The four basic skills necessary for good Investigative Criminal Profiling - investigations, forensics, psychological assessment and the application of cultural anthropology - are necessary to a complete an accurate profile. It should be recognized that experts should be consulted to fill in the gaps. A homicide investigator with limited skills in profiling might combine his skills with that of a professional profiler and as a team, increase the success of the
Q: In your opinion, which non-lethal tool on a police officer’s belt, either the taser, pepper spray, or the night stick, is best for handling the most dangerous suspects in a confrontation? A: I think all officers have under gone training to make that decision during confrontation depending on the threat to the individual, themselves and the public. All weapons can do damage if misused it’s up to training institutions to provide proper education and the officers themselves to use their discretion. Q: Do you think tasers are too powerful to be used to disarm or bring down a suspect? If yes, what if it was a last resort instead of using the gun in a non life-threatening situation?
The police are trained in “shoot” and “do not shoot” situations. They are trained to think about what happens if a bullet misses or passes through a person, who it might hit. Neither the criminal nor the average citizen is trained and would not think about it. Any person will do what is necessary to protect them or loved ones. However, thinking a gun in the hands of an “octogenarian” makes them safe is fooling themselves.