Cars produce far , far more toxic emissions than cigarettes ever will, so you question should we ban cars? Banning or restricting smoking in any public areas is clear discrimination. I think we need to look at the facts. Air quality varies from place to place, for example an average underground car park can have adverse health effects if not well ventilated. Carbon Monoxide and other various chemicals spew out of the exhausts of cars all day every day.
Moreover, “The advent of the steam locomotive and railroad also saw the start of major pollution caused by big business, which is all too often seen today. Polluted rivers and smoke-filled air began to dominate cities, which in turn created poor living and working conditions that gave rise to socialism. The most direct pollution problem created by the locomotive was the carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere. It gave way to poor air quality and poor living conditions. Additionally, the steam locomotive supported businesses and industries where pollution was an accepted and normal thing.
English 150 15 February 2007 Sport Utility’s vs. the Environment: Koehl’s Argument against Sport Utility Vehicles The Article, “Sport Utility Vehicles Are Bad for the Environment” Albert Koehl attempts to persuade the reader that SUVs cause significant damage to the environment. Koehl claims that “SUVs emit excessive amounts” of poisonous greenhouse gasses which “waste fossil fuels, and are inefficient.” He also states that these vehicles “contribute to global warming” (Koehl 129). Considering this, the safety and protection of the environment is of great importance in Koehl’s article. The proposed way to achieve this level of safety and protection is through eliminating the extensive use of SUVs. In this article, Koehl argues that SUVs are inefficient and bad for the environment.
She then states that due to their greater size the 4WDs have a “greater fuel consumption, more greenhouse gas emissions and higher operating costs” showing another way the cats impact the wellbeing of many in a negative way in the hopes of persuading the audience to see the negative impacts of these types of cars and make a move to ban them. Masters then mentions a study done by “AAMI” to add another expert opinion to her
Though it sounds like a good idea, I don’t think we as people, especially Americans, are capable of doing the hard work. Americans are too selfish and addicted to their lifestyles to ever be able to save the planet. This can be seen through the excessive use of pollutants and the lives led by American citizens. Americans, especially in bigger cities like New York, are accustomed to using all sorts of things that are bad for the environment. Trains, cars, subways, airplanes, and buses all leave behind pollutants in the air that eventually become harmful.
What comes across your mind when you hear the following, “ should the consumption of cigarettes be banned?” Would you agree or disagree? Cigarettes have become a big part of our industry and have also caused many controversial issues. Many people believe that smoking should be banned because it increases health risks, causes fire hazards and is a poor example to our younger generation. While, even though many of these things are true, many people have not taken in consideration the strong disadvantages and hard impacts that can be created if the consumption of cigarettes are banned. For example, a decrease in tax revenues, which can lead to a strong deficit in our country and the invasion of individual’s rights who choose to smoke.
Brent Rosinski Professor Duane Smith Speech 101 Sec #7405 January 31, 2012 The Negative Effects of Traffic on Commuters I. Introduction: What every day activity is one of the biggest wastes of time, money, and takes years off your life? The correct answer is traffic jams. According to Readers Digest UK in November 2011, excessive traffic jams result in wasted fuel, lost productivity due to tardiness, and high levels of stress, frustration, and road rage, which can contribute to reduced health. In addition, research suggests that exposure to high levels of traffic-related air pollution by motorists appears to boost the risk for experiencing a heart attack, as reported by USA Today on September 21, 2011.
This exploratory argumentative paper will delve deep into the case of why recycling the non0biodegradeable waste should be made mandatory by the government for all private individuals and corporate entities to comply with. The United States authorities tasked with environmental conservation have been working hard towards making sure that people understand the importance of recycling waste. These efforts, however, have not been successful as these government agencies are yet to be able to fully employ voluntary conservation approaches throughout the country. A good case in point is the city of Seattle where any individual who throws away
The dilemma in this situation is that high-powered engines use higher amounts of fuel, which emit toxins that pollute the air, which is a contributing factor to global warming. The pollution is a negative effect on air quality. Thus, building these cars is good for producers and fun consumers, but bad for society. Nuclear plants also have a micro-macro dilemma. While used to generate electricity from nuclear fuel, opponents of nuclear plants feel it poses many threats to people and the environment.
One type of pollution is air pollution that is caused by factories, and carbon monoxide given off by cars. Another type of contamination is water pollution which is caused by sewage, natural disasters, and man-made garbage being tossed in to the bodies of water. One country that’s been highly effected by pollution is Kabwe a town in Zambia, Africa. Kabwe has to deal with pollution in ways that seem odd to the everyday life of Americans. Pollution has had an enormous impact on Kabwe; even breathing is toxic for the people.