This rigidity might suggest that to an extent, US politics is still firmly rooted in the political circumstances of the late 1700s when the constitution was devised, and often struggles to adapt to some changes that occur. For instance, although the American Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865, it was not until the 1960s, almost a hundred years later, when civil rights began to be established, such as by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed under President Lyndon B Johnson. The ambiguity of the US constitution, however, can often mean that there is considerable scope for interpretation. For example, the 2nd Amendment states that it is “the right of the People to keep and bear arms”. People have disagreed for years over whether this means it is constitutional for state militias to be formed and armed, or whether it means
Texas seems to be a big states based on its population compared to the USA’s a whole with the difference of 28, 785, 484. The population listed as white only is 44.5% over USA 63.0% which makes Texas a diverse place when it comes race. The number of person per square miles in Texas (96.3) is higher than USA as a whole (87.4) with a difference 8.7. Maryland Vs. Texas. Texas is a bigger state than Maryland with a population difference of 20,174, 640.
Judicial review was established through judicial interpretation in court case Marbury v. Madison. The Supreme Court justices interpreted that the Constitution gives them to right to review laws for constitutionality. Another informal method is incorporation of traditions, precedent and practice. Although not enumerated in the Constitution, a traditional practice may be widely used because of widely acceptance. Political faction is one example of amending the Constitution informally.
How effectively does Congress fulfil its constitutional roles? To start of this essay we must first understand what the role of Congress actually is? The United States Congress is the bicameral legislature of the federal government of the United States consisting of two houses: the House of Representatives and the Senate. It is the law-maker which is the primary and most important function of the legislature. It is through laws that policies of government are laid down for implementation.
This is where the case would fall because states limited jurisdiction courts hear matters that are specialized or in nature. General and Special Jurisdiction courts in the state of Texas would fall under District Court which would handle original jurisdiction in several actions over $200, divorce, felony crime matters, juvenile matters, and 13 District Court’s design criminal district. General and specialized jurisdiction courts would be over county level courts but if Sun City Entertainment appeal decision we would surpass the courts. The next course of action would be state appeals courts. State Intermediate Appeals Court in the state of Texas are from trial courts in their respective courts of appeal districts.
The judicial branch consists of the Supreme Courts and Federal Courts. Judges are selected or elected as members of these courts to enforce the law. In summary, the legislative branch makes the law, the executive branch carries out the law and the judicial branch enforces the law. These branches interact with each in such a way that each branch relies on the other two branches for their
Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy that states that a court has the right to, and should go beyond what is stated in the Constitution about an issue that is being brought up and look towards “broader” suggestions of the impending decision on said issue. Basically, the court “strikes down a law and then makes a statement that [may] change a law or policy in a significant fashion (Stankiewicz)”. A good example of judicial activism is the case of Roe v. Wade. In this case the Supreme Court determined that Texas law criminalizing, or essentially trying to outlaw abortion was unconstitutional. Strict Constructionism, on the other hand, is a distinct legal philosophy that limits or controls some judicial interpretation.
Or should I say the unlimited power that is given. The government has set limitations to what they could tax and how much, however two of these limits were open to interpretation: providing for common defense and general welfare. The government becomes its own judge and jury while establishing these criteria, because the budget for common defense is set by the government, as well as the standard for what the general welfare is. As the Constitution says all laws set by the government become "supreme law of the land". The language used in itself is that of a monarchy and did not sit well with
Strengths and weaknesses of the courts as law makers The courts have a number of strengths and weaknesses in their ability to make laws A strength of the courts is that they have the ability to give meaning to legislation. Courts are able to apply relevant law to the cases brought before. This application of the law sometimes requires courts to interpret the wording in the Act and give them meaning. An example of a case where courts were required to give meaning to the words of an Act was the studded belt case (1996). In this case a man had his studded belt taken off him and seized as a weapon under the Controlled Weapons Act.
The Great Compromise was an official contract for the big and small states that have two representatives in the upper house for each state. The Constitution addressed the weaknesses by letting the central government specific privileges. The Compromise or The Great Compromise,