Twelve Angry Men: Not Guilty

424 Words2 Pages
Sarah Dodge Period 5 5/11/09 Twelve Angry Men The boy was not guilty in my opinion. The jury did in fact vote the boy not guilty even though at the beginning of jury session all, but one man voted the boy to be guilty. I believe that there was not enough conclusive evidence to state that the boy was in fact guilty of murdering his father. One of two eye witness on the case was proven or seen to not be wearing her eye glasses in attempts to look younger, yet this meant that the lady needed eye glasses and that it was not probable for her to have seen the boy murder his father through the windows of the train. I believe that with the evidence against the boy or in the crime scene at all there is room for reasonable doubt in the case

More about Twelve Angry Men: Not Guilty

Open Document