Twelve Angry Men

675 Words3 Pages
1. With reference to at least two characters, in “Twelve Angry Men”, discuss how a person’s background can strongly influence their judgement and views -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the film Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a group of twelve men from various different backgrounds come together in a hot, crowded room to deliberate over the decision of sending a nineteen-year old man suspected for murder to his death. In this stuffy room, tensions run high and we come to see how strongly someone’s background can influence their judgement and views, mainly demonstrated through Juror 10’s uncaring and prejudiced character, Juror 3’s emotional baggage and how it becomes the foundation to his refusal to be impartial and Juror 11 with his deep appreciation for justice and the American legal system. Forty-six year old, garage owner Juror 10 can be described as an angry, bitter old man with no value on human life save his own. He is extremely prejudiced and unleashes his bigotry to the others saying “That’s the way they are! By nature! You know what I mean? VIOLENT” and “Human life don’t mean as much to them as it does to us” before the accusation “These people are dangerous. They’re wild. Listen to me.” His racist and prejudiced stereotyping and views disgust most of the other jurors and results in them turning their backs on him. His background does explain his thinking that people from poor neighbourhoods were “all the same”. He is an aged man, and would have grown up in times where strong racial prejudice and stereotypes were significant. This background would have had considerable influence over his view that the defendant was “real trash” and his inability to take his role as jury seriously. Background had a strong negative impact on his judgement and views, as it

More about Twelve Angry Men

Open Document