American Translation– This law means if you blame someone for a crime you have to arrest them, if you can’t prove they committed the crime, you will be executed. I think this law is bad because it’s wrong, If you blame someone for something and you really think they did it arrest them, yes, but if you can’t prove they committed the crime or have no evidence that they did it then set them free and try to find more evidence that the first person committed the crime, there’s no need to put a person to death because they can’t prove that someone
As a result of this he just got life in prison WITH a chance of parole. This is in just because it was a horrible event, he didn’t get what he deserved, and it allows others to get away with the idea of doing wrong without being fully punished. Without a doubt, you should consider this an act of injustice. To begin with, the Charles Manson case was a situation of injustice because it was a horrible event. To further explain this event, Charles Manson was a leader of a colt.
Plus as I stated before, you may adversely place yourself in-between the correction officers and the inmates. This could cause an extremely hostile work environment for you and could possibly result in you losing your job through malice intentions. However, as I stated before the “right” or ethical thing to do is to report the assault as a crime. Letting the criminal justice field handle the situation letting the chips fall where they may. You then allow
University of Phoenix Material: Robin Mravik Ethical Dilemma Worksheet Incident Review 1. What is the ethical issue or problem? Identify the issue succinctly. | The law enforcement officials did suspect that the individual was driving under the influence and thus becoming a risk to himself and everyone else around him. Before the law enforcement officer can make an arrest there has to be a clear sign of probable cause if an officer neglects to find probable cause before arresting the individual when the trial comes along, the case will be dismissed in court and the offender will walk away free.
He or she will also face problems when trying to obtain a job. For the reason that they don’t find jobs, he or she will tend to turn to criminal acts for financial gain which will often lead to reincarceration. In my opinion plea bargaining is not fair and it’s corrupt. Especially with people that are guilty and take the plea bargain they don’t received the proper correction. Likewise it is not fair for a person that is innocent and is pressured to plea bargain for the believe that he or she will most likely not be considered not guilty.
It is never a good idea to carry a fake ID or run from the cops because of the many dangers (Potentially Fatal) that stray along with these acts. Firstly I should have stayed right where I was when the cops pulled up the night of the incident. I should have stood in there best sight and stood still until I was approached, but I followed my poor judgment and ran. This act was dangerous for
The actus reus is that the victim must suffer actual bodily harm as a result of the battery. In this case Ken has broken his nose as the result of Toby’s punches. The mens rea is intentionally or recklessly inflicting unlawful force on the victim. Even if Toby did not intend actual bodily harm or foresaw a risk that his act might cause actual bodily harm, it would still satisfy the mens rea as S47 is a constructive offence. In this case Toby has been reckless and it seems that he also intended to cause the harm because he was angry.
Boundary violations are always unethical and are likely to be illegal” (Ofer Zur, 2011). Unfortunately “problems with setting and maintaining boundaries are common issues dealt with in counseling” (LaCombe, 2007). As a professional Tom should have been conscience of the choices that he was making and the lines that he was crossing. If there was a personal attraction to the client Tom was obligated to notify a supervisor and have him removed from the
Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because of crimal justice. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because the person could run. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because now there are camera's that capture everything we do. Another opinion why this law should not be used today is because it is stupid to kill someone just because they stole some property. Another opinion is because some people do not like to kill
If the sex is not consented by both parties is then clearly it shouldn’t happen. It’s a violation of one’s person space and boundary. Depending on the severity of it, it can also be looked at the as violent act upon someone. When assaults of this nature are reported we are always trying figure out the reasoning behind it making excuses for the aggressor. There is a need for sovereignty and individual freedom that the assault takes away, and therefore that is the reason why a lot of cases go unreported.