Transporation Policy Act Essay

802 Words4 Pages
Case Study Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) Jacque C. Crumpton American Military University Case Study Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) On August 10, 2005, the SAFETEA-LU was signed into law by President George W. Bush. In addition, the authorization bill that governed the United States federal surface transportation spending, which was replaced with the bill with Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act in 2012. Although SAFETEA-LU increased investment in highways, supported transit and retained the basic goals and structure of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) (American Public Works Association (APWA), 2005), it caused various issues. The negatives impact of SAFETEA-LU resulted in funds being inadequately used and applied to projects with lower importance (Roth, 2010). In addition, finances were allocated to non-highway activities and funds were unequally distributed amongst states (Roth, 2010). Nonetheless, there are alternatives solutions to mitigate the issues that resulted from SAFETEA-LU. For instance, to ensure funds are appropriately used and devoted to high-priority projects, Congress politicians should prohibit the practice of earmarking. Earmarking occurs when “members of Congress slipping in funding for particular projects requested by special interest groups in their districts” (Roth, 2010). Similarly, to address the second issue of funds not being allocated to non-highway activities, the bill should explicitly specify and define eligible highway activities. According to Roth (2010), the majority of Americans do not rely on rail transit; therefore, the people should not have to pay for the creation of expensive transportation systems, which is some instances discourages the use

More about Transporation Policy Act Essay

Open Document