These p-plate laws are affective in reducing accidents on the road, because they reduce p-plate drivers to a low speed as well as slow cars. Peer pressure is another important factor which can cause accidents on the road. The current laws help to reduce peer pressure, by not allowing p-plate drivers under the age of 25 no more than one passenger at a time under the age of 21 between the hours of 11pm and 5am. This p-plate law helps in reducing peer pressure related accidents, because it stops overcrowded cars and distractions from friends, which allows the driver to focus only on the road. Lastly, Drivers safety is an important issue within the current p-plate
I no longer get road rage, because I simply don’t care whether other drivers are going slow or cutting me off. 5. Simplify your life. This is related to the one above, but expanded. In addition to saving your stress levels, driving slower can reduce many other complications as well — the
Boseley’s audience would tend to be people who agree that heightened gun control in the US would lead to less deaths in major cities like Detroit or New York. Hawkins’ readers would agree that gun control only leads to more deaths in the US because people start to handle guns and gun trade
People believe that putting cameras on poles and taking pictures will not stop these kinds of accidents. In synopsis, traffic light cameras need to be placed at all major intersections because they prevent accidents,help with the county revenue, and provide extra assistance for the law enforcement. There are concerns from the public with red light cameras, such as the driver of the car can not be positively identified and they increase accidents instead of reducing them. However, there will be more positive reinforcement than negative by providing more traffic light cameras to major intersections. Overall, they will not only improve road safety, they will also save
I believe whole-heartedly that government intervention as well as taxation should be justified when these industries are not providing optimal amount of a good for society’s well-being. When a tax is put on someone’s favorite soda, they are either going to buy a similar drink that is untaxed or not buy the drink at all. Typically, the body does not account for liquid calories as much as it does food calories, therefore making it easier to drink more sugared drinks. Usually people do not to feel full from a sugary drink, which makes it less likely to buy foods that will replace the taxed beverage. They would be more likely to drink one or two more cans of soda rather than eating a snack or a full meal.
At first glance, it seems like a good idea to have the driving age raised to eighteen, but it is not as beneficial as it seems. Nationally, about forty percent of American teen deaths are from motor vehicle crashes, making them a major concern for parents and teens alike, but raising the driving age won’t fix this, and it could actually make this statistic worse. There are good reasons as to why the driving age should not be raised: it is inexperience not young age that causes crashes, parents of minors are allowed to deny their children licenses or permits, and raising the driving age would make it harder to get drivers proper training. It is true that the risk of crashing is higher for the sixteen to eighteen age group than any other. This is the main reason that a lot of people want to have the driving age raised.
Sitz has to do with the police having the right to have checkpoints to catch people drinking and driving. The court reasoned that checkpoints are designed to eliminate immediate hazards posed by intoxicated drivers. This ruling may not seem substantially important to policing at first glance, but I feel keeping the public safe is a top priority for the police. These checkpoints enable the police to temporarily detain people who are, at that moment, a very serious threat to the public. The checkpoints have probably saved thousands of lives and this would not be possible if the police could only check for intoxication after someone has violated the law.
Docs Google+ Gmail Calendar more All DocsEdit thesis and body paragraph Thesis statement for research paper Firearms have reduced the crime and death rate among citizens because it allows them to protect themselves and adding more gun legislation will only hinder their right to self defence thus making them more vulnerable to crime and death. Body paragraph 3 Countries that enforced strict gun laws and even banned certain types of firearms have seen an increase in crime and death, while at the same time making it nearly impossible for their citizens to protect themselves. Rates of crime and violence have been on the rise in countries that have banned or made it very difficult to obtain firearms by lawful citizens . This has been
Who are we to question their judgment? And who really believes all of that scientific bullshit about alcohol slowing a persons reaction time, when if anything it slows one's action time? By this I mean that alcohol doesn't slow the drivers reaction to driving anymore than it slows his action of driving. if you drive at a reduced speed you will have more time to react anyway. Then if drinking alcohol slows your driving time you have more time to react, causing alcohol to make driving a car much safer.
Overall, those who are arguing for using red light cameras in Knoxville, like Fatalmistake68, say that the cameras make intersections safer. Commenters who oppose red light cameras in Knoxville are usually arguing about something beside safety; they are arguing that the cameras are unjust, as BainxGriffith states in his comment. Another argument found in the comments section below the article is about whether or not laws about stopping for three seconds before turning on a red light exist and whether they are right or just. Those who think laws about stopping before turning on red lights are in favor of the camera use, and those who disagree don’t want the cameras