2. When diagramming an argument, conditional statements should be treated as containing two statements, where the antecedent and consequent are each given a separate number. Answer: falser Reason: because conditional statements should be treated as a single statements. 3. Any time an arguer intentionally leaves a premise or conclusion unstated, it is safe to assume that the omission was intended to conceal a weak or questionable step in the argument.
This is so, because verbless clauses are subject-initial. According to Cynthia Miller, “verbless clause express a predication whose central concern is to identify the subject, an interpretation that is theologically problematic within the context” (4). The problem with verbless clause in Biblical Hebrew has to do with the determination of which of the part to a verbless clause serves as the subject or the predicate. The simplest and the most insightful way to describe verbless clauses is to regard them as essentially identical with a subclass of the clauses in which the verb hyh can occur but has been ommited, thus creating the verbless or nominal clauses (Sinclair 52). The absence of an overt predicate - compliment appears to evoke some sense of the being or occurence of the subject in certain situations.
We can conclude that the data are Poisson distributed. Chi-Square test of independence Problem 12.12 Use the following contingency table to determine whether variable 1 is independent of variable 2. Let α = .01 | Variable 2 | Variable1 | 24 | 13 | 47 | 58 | | 93 | 59 | 187 | 244 | Step 1 Ho: the two classifications are independent Ha: the two classifications are dependent Step 2 d.f = (r – 1) (c – 1) Step 3 α = 0.01 x 2 0.01, 3df = 11.3449 Step 4 Reject Ho if x 2 > 11.3449 | Variable 2 | Total | Variable1 | 24 (22.92) | 13 (14.10) | 47 (45.83) | 58 (59.15) | 142 | | 93 (94.08) | 59 (57.90) | 187 (188.17) | 244 (242.85) | 583
The co-writers Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber in their essay ‘On Verbal Irony’ discuss in details what verbal irony is. They explore and illustrate traditional accounts of verbal irony, and also draw attention to some problems with this definition.  Traditional accounts of verbal irony Verbal irony is a trope, and involves the substitution of a figurative for a literal meaning. It is defined as the trope in which the figurative meaning is the opposite of the literal meaning: Irony is the figure used to covey the opposite of what is said. In irony the words are not taken in their basic literal sense.
a. equivocation b. illicit minor c. four-terms fallacy d. invalid conversion Question 2 A basic form of deductive argument is ________. a. inductive reasoning. b. the proposition. c. causation. d. the syllogism.
To illustrate this idea, Feinburg (2010) states, 'History is the record of past experience. Theory is the generalization of that experience. Its that simple"(579). Salamon on the other hand argues that Feinburg's view is too simple in the sense that sie views social construction as simple and lived gender as complex. Salamon suggests that Feinberg's view of social construction is an adjective that wants to modify both social and construction.
For example, Signed Exact English cannot be considered a “non-English” language; it assigns a unique sign to each English word and uses standard English grammar and syntax.) Scholarly research also supports the idea that ASL is a foreign language. Drawing upon interpreter/linguist Rhonda Jacobs’ article “ASL as a Truly Foreign Language,” we created a chart that classifies languages into one of four categories according to degree to which they differ from English (see appendix.) According to the Department of State’s Foreign Service Institute, ASL is classified with Arabic, Japanese, Chinese, and Korean in the highest level, Group Four; the higher the level, the more difficult is the language to learn, owing largely to its being substantially different from
"We need to control street prostitution because it is currently unregulated." | | | | Explanation Circular reasoning. The premise and the conclusion are simply re-statements of each other. (p. 433) | | 0 points Question (Non Graded Questions) | | Q.2) | Identify which broad category of test (i.e., mental ability, personality) and which type of specific test category (i.e., achievement, aptitude, intelligence, creativity) is illustrated by each of the following examples. You may refer to more than one kind of test.
Nicole Brouwer 2nd hour Honors English Don’t Judge a Book by its Cover “The discovery of truth is prevented more effectively, not by the false appearance things present and which mislead into error, not directly by weakness of the reasoning powers, but by preconceived opinion, by prejudice.” -Arthur Schopenhauer Stereotyping, superstitions, and being prejudice are all components that lead to misjudging others. Many myths have been associated with different ethnic groups, and it leads to ethnic segregation. An understanding about other cultures may help decrease the negativity and overcomes prejudice. What does being prejudice mean? Why do societies leap at the chance to judge others?
| | |- be considered metaphors because the word or words used are not taken literally | Note: When the distinction is made, it is the following: when A is used to refer to B, it is a synecdoche if A is a component of B and a metonymy if A is commonly associated with B but not actually part of its whole. PART 3: SUMMARY 1. Which one is the most appropriate definition of metonymy a. Metonymy is the use of comparision of one thing with another. Metonymy is the use of word or phrase to indicate something different from the literal meaning. Metonymy is the use of the name of one thing to substitute for that of another to which it is related.