Tonya Buell Slavery In America

2765 Words12 Pages
Slavery in America Some authors seem to disagree about slavery in America and if the abolishment of slavery was a good thing at the time or separated our country. History seems to get twisted as time goes on. Not all historical documents are factual and exact. Historical writers sometimes twist writings to fit their opinion or to make people think one way or another. As time goes on, verbal historical stories get changed and twisted around. Slavery may have separated our country for a short time but was it for the better? I read two books that pertained to the subject of slavery and what kind of an impact it had on our country. One of the books I read was Slavery in America, by Tonya Buell. According to the book Slavery began and…show more content…
Growing abolitionist sentiment in the North after the 1830s and northern opposition to slavery's extension into the new western territories led many southerners to fear that the existence of slavery in America--and thus the backbone of their economy--was in danger. . In these years, Slavery was what kept the South alive and at the same time, gradually aided in its demise. The limited diversity of the Southern Economy and the slaves led to the fall of the Southern economy. Slavery had an extensive impact on the economy of the Southern States. Because there was essentially only one main crop that the South produced, they were bound to the North. The economy evolved around cotton industry. Eli Whitney invitented the cotton gin, thinking that it would decrease slaves in the south, but however they were making cotton so much and so fast that the needed even more slaves than they already had so that they can run all the cotton gins. The reason why the demand went up for cheap labor was due to the fact that farmers weren’t making enough profit off their goods;…show more content…
This book was more about how slavery helped the demand on farmers in the south so that they could harvest all the food, cotton and tobacco as there was a demand for. A wag might argue that the origins of the Confederacy dated to the philosophy of Aristotle, who proposed that differences arising from race and regional origin and the birth created natural distinctions between peoples and their inherent abilities. Yet there is substance in the case beyond Aristotle’s speculations of human variations ( Davis pg 12). The South mainly wanted slavery because; they wanted to be able to have workers but not have to pay for them. This is how the South made their money. They depended on slavery to keep the growth of their farms, and plantations good. The South needed slavery; the North didn’t and was more against slavery than the south. The North worked in mills, factories, they owned and operated. The South needed people who would work in the fields for little or no money at all. The South even used their slaves for their army. The North worked in mills, factories, they owned and operated, and The South grew cotton and tobacco. They needed people who would work in the fields for little or no money at all. So if it wasn’t for slavery the South would of had an extremely hard time farming everything there was a demand for, they didn’t have a bunch of people in factories with a lot of
Open Document