There are some good points and also has bad points in the two stories. In “Gregory”, the soldiers gave Gregory two chances to escape because they are justice but he didn’t. And in “Just-”.The barber wanted to kill Captain Torres to save more people. But at last he didn’t because he still want to live in the world peaceful. However, justice is still the most part in both stories.
The Nazis inhumanity and brutality slowly diminished his hope and desire to live. Despite Elie’s constant battle, it is from the interaction with other characters that he is able to maintain his hope. Elie depends on his father for support, and his love for his father makes him strengthen his hope and desire to live. When they arrived at the camp, his father said that he would rather Elie to go with his mother than to see what they were going to experience as men. The father began to cry and this was the only time that Elie saw his father cry.
Baca later states, while being in jail, “All the fights I’d won to prove I was a man didn’t matter; nothing mattered expect what I was going to do now. The longer I postponed the inevitable showdown, the more it looked like I was afraid and the stronger it made him.” (Page #) When Baca says him he is referring to the black man who comes off as threat to him so something has to be done before the worse comes to him. Being put in this predicament he has to prove he’s a man so he can feel accepted from the society in jail. Along with masculinity, Baca has a hard time dealing with abandonment. As a
During his years in prison, Edmond is fueled by his lust for revenge. And once he is out of prison his years of planning have made him patient enough to execute his plan for revenge perfectly. In the end after all his planning the count is left unfulfilled by his revenge, and all those years spent planning were wasted. The count should have forgiven instead of seeking revenge, and maybe he would have enjoyed his life more. Dumas showed the readers that forgiveness ultimately leaves one feeling more satisfied than revenge.
Second, there was a verbal agreement between Hrafnkel and Einar which made both of them responsible for their actions and justified the act. Third, Hrafnkel even compensation for Einar’s death, something he’d never done previously. Lastly, Einar’s father was the one who made him leave the house and look for a job, and allowed him to work under a man like Hrafnkel. Hrafnkel may still be guilty in a regard that he did kill Einar due to his solemn oath, which cannot be changed. However, it was not only Hrafnkel’s fault.
His wife, friends, and innocent people were being accused for crimes they did not commit. He made heroic and difficult decisions in order to help the issue as much as he could. When he had to choose between confessing and hanging, he had an epiphany. He realized that John Proctor was not a bad man, but a good man that had sinned. When John understands what the source of his downfall was, he had the strength to stand up to the unmoral society and die in defense of the
Mr. Keating talks him in being a free-thinking individual and leader, Todd Anderson was able over come the final obstacle of his instability only following after his friend Neils suicide. Charles Dalton Charlie can be considered as a dynamic character because he takes on the role as an above the law role, he feels he should always be in conrol of the situation and that he will not have to face the consequences of any of his avtions. He changes toward the end though because he doesn't care about authority until Mr. Keating gets to him. Then at the end when wellton is trying to find who the reason of neils suicide is Cameron tells the authority that it was Mr. Keatings fault Charlie gets pissed off and punches Cameron across the face. It shows that hes starting to care about Mr. Keating and before you wouldn't of been able to see that in his
The story was impacted in such a huge way because if Dantes had never looked for vengeance when he escaped from prison he could of just got out and lived a normal life without him having to waste more of his time having to hunt down all those people that hurt him. All he could of done when he got out of prison was to have forgotten about the past to start a new life. “I regret having helped you clarify your past and having told you what I did. Why? Because I've instilled in your heart a feeling that wasn't there before:vengeance.” (Dumas 58) The theme of also impacted Dantes a lot ,because he had already wasted fourteen years of his life because of what his enemies did to him , and now he was going to waste many more years on them trying to set his plan of vengeance in action.
This quote describes Dewey Bozella because,He never gave up on what he believed in. Why was it important to Dewey Bozella not to admit to a crime he did not commit? Even when he was offered to get released from prison early if he admitted to the crime.Dewey Bozella was a man who had perseverance,self-respect,strong will,and honored his reputation. Bozella had a lot more perseverance than most people because, he was offered to be released from prison early if he admitted to murder. Even though he did not commit the crime he was accused of.
Tsotsi: A Clichéd Redemption Of A Criminal Tsotsi is a cruel, ruthless criminal. Yet, with the use of effective filming and storyline, he evokes sympathy at the end of the film when he is arrested. The audience believes that he has changed into a better man in a matter of days. This is very cliché and typical of any film that shows the evolution of a bad character into a good character. I think that the audience is very naive for feeling sympathy for Tsotsi because he is a criminal that was involved with the murder of two people; Butcher and Zachariah.