Smokers Get a Raw Deal by Stanley S. Scott addresses the issue of whether there is discrimination against smokers in the United States. Scott believes that there is negative discrimination in the U.S. that infringes the rights of the citizens. One can find that although the writer believes he presents a secure case, he fails to understand the definition of “discrimination.” In the article, Scott essentially asks the readers to heed the ways in which laws, especially antismoking laws, are established. This could have been a good argument were it not for the bombardment of fallacies and incidents taken out of context. He only presents one premise, that laws facilitate the segregation between smokers and nonsmokers, and consequently allow organized crimes harassing smokers to occur.
Reading Assessment for America’s Unjust Drug War by Michael Huemer In America’s Unjust Drug War, author Michael Huemer, a philosophy professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder, expresses his opinion that illegal drug laws are seriously unjust because they violate a person’s natural right to control their own body. Huemer gives the viewpoint of both sides of this issue by examining the arguments that would be made by Prohibitionists and Legalizers. He focuses on three very prominent arguments in the debate for drug legalization. First, he brings forth the argument that drugs should be outlawed because they cause harm to the drug user. He dismisses this argument by listing other activities that could be harmful to an individual such as smoking tobacco, riding motorcycles, and having unprotected sex.
Event: Prohibition I. The Rise and Fall of Prohibition on Alcohol(Rose Dryer, History 10B, Writing an Outline) II. Introduction A. Prohibition is still alive today due to subtle brainwashing by the government of the American public about things other than alcohol. B.
Social Responsibility EST1 Task 1 Company Q's current attitude toward social responsibility can best be described as nonexistent. While a business's ultimate goal is to create profit, businesses should enlist community friendly practices to strengthen both the company and the community as a whole. Three areas that Company Q needs to reevaluate are as follows; (1) closing down stores because of the crime rate in that specific part of town; (2) only offering high margin items that are health conscious; and (3) wasting food instead of donating it to local food banks. Company Q has recently closed a couple of stores due to a pattern of lost profits. These two stores were in high-crime-rate areas.
Marxist also claim that the government in a capitalist society allows companies to add to ill-health in society; for example; Tobacco companies cause cancer by selling cigarettes and this could also lead to health conditions such as lung cancer. Alcohol could cause someone to become a alcoholic and could cause health conditions such as liver and pancreas cancer. Some chemical companies some cause air and water pollution The government doesn’t spend enough money trying to resolve the main causes of ill-health for example poor housing and poverty. Health and ill-health has to be viewed as a social class problem that is related to social inequality. However unlike the functionalists who regard ill-
Customs officers are expected to do their job and put a stop to the drug trafficking but the temptation of making some extra money may be extremely strong. Money is the root of all evil and a lot of people are very selfish. For an example, they know the effects drugs have on a society as a whole but if the price is high enough, they may turn their head and allow the drugs to be brought in. Not only is this wrong, it is damaging to everyone. “It is believed that the loss of the drug trafficking industry in Mexico would cause that country’s economy to shrink by over 63 percent” (DrugAbuse.net, (2012), para.
It makes sense that the government should take actions to stop monopolies from doing the things the Sherman Act makes illegal. Then I read an article by Milton Friedman published during the time of the trial titled “The Business Community's Suicidal Impulse” (which I’m betting you’ve read). He makes a good argument for how enforcing antitrust laws tends to lead the way to regulation of an industry which may hurt competition and cause more harm than good in the long run.
Therefore, the government should have the right to discourage smoking. The cost of treating these diseases is very high. The money that smokers pour into the economy with the purchase of cigarettes is very much overshadowed by the amount of money the government
According to the book “Dumping is a term apparently coined by Mother Jones magazine to refer to the practice of exporting to other countries products that have been banned or declared hazardous in the United States”. (Shaw, 2005) There are other sources for the meaning of dumping though. One of these can be found at stfrancis.edu, which says dumping is “when a foreign company sells their products or services in a market at a price which is below their cost of production in order to gain market share.” (Powers) With the first definition we can see that it’s morally wrong. You are selling products that have been proven to be bad for people to use. It doesn’t matter how much damage it could cause, you are intentionally harming people.
Research Paper There are many things that are detrimental to our health. Some of these things are natural, like viruses and bacteria and some of these things are man-made, like guns and cigarettes. Why would we create things that could ultimately kill us? People are driven by all sorts of things and one of the biggest things is greed. Tobacco, and specifically cigarettes, have been the most detrimental, but preventable thing to our health in the United States for the years they have been around.