But was it a "just war," an "unjust war" or some combination of both? This paper will try to answer that question. Before we can apply the principles of just or unjust war to the struggle in America in the 1860s, we have to find out what the terms mean. They are philosophical, and people have been wrestling with them since ancient times. War itself has a very specific definition, which it is useful to mention here because we have to know what war is before we can determine whether or not it is just.
Socially the war was not revolutionary because, there was still that one race that was not treated like they belonged and felt like they were taking up space. Politically the war was not revolutionary because, the imprisoned slaves were not allowed to be apart of the Declaration of Independence. Therefore Revolution was both revolutionary and not revolutionary because, of the three stated topics above. The American Revolution was the most important event in the history of the world since the birth of Christ,-stated by Richard Price. The Revolution was revolutionary based on economic factors because, as apart of the empire the colonies were protected from foreign invasion by the British military.
War is Necessary When given this complex assignment on war being necessary, our group had conflicting opinions. Some group members believed that wars could be avoided by discussing the situations that brought the groups to that breaking point. They also felt that war is wrong because of the killing of innocent civilians and the destruction of civilizations. Others believed that war was a necessary part of civilizations. They believed that, was often very tragic it can in most instances produce many beneficial outcomes.
Thus, to not disturb it they took Germany out before they became too powerful. Greed, fear and disregard of human life is the ultimate recipe for war. The best example of a war that was justifiable was that of World War Two. France and the UK could have let
When an alliance is signed, those countries become known as Allies. A number of alliances had been signed by countries between the years 1879 and 1914 when the WW1 arose. The alliances formed two big groups of countries before the war, the Triple Alliances and the Triple Entente. They were the main countries involved in the war. In addition alliance agreements were thought to prevent any sort of outbreaks of conflict, but it wasn’t effective.
Did Germany cause the war? Who and what started World War 1? The verdict that I agree with of who started World War 1 is: “All of the major powers helped to start the war. They should share the blame.” I think this because one nation can not simply declare war at a country without knowing the consequences. If several countries declare war on each other then this is possible.
The Just War Theory The analysis of war from justice or injustice has been one of the most outstanding in the history of “moral reality” of war. The just war theory is part of a tendency that attempts to justify war. This tendency is the relative warmongering theory. According to this theory the reasons that may lead a state to declare war are self-defense issues, redress a tort, claim a natural or positive right or prevent an attack. At first glance it seems unreasonable to distinguish between just and unjust wars because we may think that all war is unjust in itself.
CAN A EVER BE JUST? Many argue whether a war could be justified or not. In my essay I will be discussing whether it's justifiable or not. A just war is war waged according to moral rules defined by St Augustine and St Thomas Aquinas.The conditions for a just war are 1. the war must only be started and controlled by the authority of the state or the ruler, 2. there must be a just- cause;those attacked are attacked because they deserve it, 3. the war must be fought to promote good or avoid evil. Peace and justice must be restored afterwards.
If the countries try to solve their problems peacefully through negotiation, it may result to mild tension but in contrast, if they want a war over a piece of land; people would be killed, cities would be damaged or destroyed. As a result the tension between the two countries would be huge and any future efforts of negotiation would be much more difficult. There are certain situations when violence may be justified. Let’s take World War II as an example. Hitler was advancing his plans to expand Germany in the late 1930s.