This legislation was introduced in a rapid fashion following the attack of 9/11. Because of this, it had some points of vagueness and left it open for misinterpretation. Organizations like the ACLU fed on this and released multiple reports demeaning the substance of the Act. In doing this, it introduced fear to the public that their civil liberties were being greatly compromised. In reality, the majority of the legislation is directed towards people suspected of terrorism.
Down with the Patriot Act The Patriot Act is a very controversial law. It allows the government much more room to do as they please. Some of these practices that government officials can do are monitoring phone calls, emails, and going through personal records. They say this will help prevent terrorism, but is losing one’s privacy really worth it? Could there be a better way to prevent terrorism?
The key provisions will be identified along with their meanings to both governmental agencies and the average citizen. Section 203 (b) and (d) information sharing: allows information from criminal probes to be shared with intelligence agencies and other parts of the government. These provisions are at the heart of the effort to break down the barriers that used to separate criminal and intelligence investigations. The United States Justice Department has frequently blamed these barriers for the failure to find and detain September 11th hijackers prior to the attacks. CIA agents had information significantly prior to the attacks that some of the hijackers were in the United States and were suspected terrorists, but the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) claims they did not receive the information until August
Most people are clueless about the laws that are passed in the U.S until they are put into effect. In a column that was posted in The Nation, Williams, tries in relaying her point that the U.S Patriot Act, which was established as a means in thwarting further terrorist acts, is taking away the very rights it is trying to preserve. Throughout the paper she tries in establishing a foundation with the reader. To get the reader to really take her point into consideration, she uses rhetorical appeals. She builds her character and credibility to build up her ethos and how she wants to project herself.
In recent news the US Government has been questioned about the legality of their surveillance practices in the National Security Agency(NSA). This is proof that the government is indeed hiding certain aspects of our society. Our troubles in Syria are also proof that there are nuclear weapons that are indeed unknown to the rest of the world. Brave New World made me question a lot of aspects of the United States of America things like the War on drugs, why is that there is a war on drugs when the reason there are drugs are because of the government. Why is there countless evidence that the reason there are drugs such as cocaine, LSD, heroin, and speed?
There were many reasons why the consolidated terror watch-list was created. The main reason it was created was to help the government and other agencies slow down the time of processing people’s names in the computer. Data governance that would help the organization manage the availability, usability, integrity, and security of the data seems to be missing. It would help increase the security, data quality privacy, and compliance with government regulation. The FBI Terrorist Screening Center was established to standardize and organize information about suspected terrorist between multiple government agencies into a single list to enhance communication between agencies.
During times of war, it is understandable that the Government will be more apt to protect its people. In the United States, terrorism has become a major concern. This has come to light more recently after the 9/11 attack in 2004. Americans have been told that terrorism is their biggest enemy. Though in the attempts to obtain security, the people of the United States are giving up their freedoms and others are having those same freedoms taken away from them.
Argumentative Essay Blowback Blowback is a well-known terminology to the US government and CIA. Not all American citizens may know of the term blowback and its meaning. However, in the book Eagles Shadow the author Mark Hertsgard states the definition, ““Blowback” is a CIA term for how foreign policy can come back to haunt a country years later in unforeseen ways, especially after cases of secret operations” (80). The US in the past has encountered blowbacks including: the 9/11 attack and the Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979. However, the blowback does not only transpire here in America it happens in other countries as well.
The statistics can give us an understanding as to the levels of these crimes and as to why or where they are most likely to occur. However because not all crimes which are reported, are actually recorded, the true extent to crime can never be revealed through official statistics or otherwise. Positivists believe that official statistics are indeed very useful to the understanding of social problems. They believe that because official statistics look at such a large proportion of the population that it allows us to make comparisons over time and make comparisons between different societies. They can allow generalisations to be made and over time they can have some affect on laws within society.
But if journalists knew that other news stations were watching them, they would be less likely to do it anyway. The video we watched in class about the truth behind the show “How to Catch A Predator” is a prime example of the importance of the news media covering the news media. Many were skeptical of the show prior the CBS’s special behind the NBC sting operation. People knew