To What Extent Do You Agree with the View That the Us Constitution Does Not Work?

487 Words2 Pages
The US Constitution is a very complicated document. It was written in 1787 and first ratified in 1788 by the founding fathers. It is the highest law in the land and is the core principles of the American Government. Some people argue that in the recent years that modern democracy has out grown the Constitution and it no longer works. Some parts of the constitution are not fit for today's society, for instance the 2nd Amendment after many terrible events most recently Sandy Hook. The amendment process is too difficult and thereby this makes it almost impossible to remove parts of the constitution that is no longer applicable, this is also the case with adding parts which is needed or a majority desires. The supreme court has too much power to amend the meaning of the Constitution, with each Judge as well getting to serve life at the court. District of Columbia lacks representation in Congress. Roughly 600,000 people live in the area, they pay taxes and serve in the US military do not get representation. Nearly 70% of Americans say the government today is worse than intended, Also the US Constitution can cause gridlock within the Federal Government, because it gives too much power to those who oppose change and 58% of Americans say they would like to see more bipartisanship. Difference in political ideology means that gridlock is caused by the checks and balances in the constitution. This means that laws which really need to be passed or sensible laws which are against one parties ideology or certain senators can't get passed, for example Obama's gun background check laws cannot be voted in due to gridlock caused by republicans and some democrats. However, you can argue that the US Constitution still does work. Federalism has proved to be an excellent compromise between a strong national government and state government diversity. The Supreme Court's power of
Open Document