To What Extent Did the Outbreak of the Thirty Years War in 1618 Destabilise Religion in England?

309 Words2 Pages
To what extent did the outbreak of the Thirty Years War in 1618 destabilise religion in England? Back in the 17th century, Europe was divided into Catholic and Protestant countries. The two different religious beliefs caused the beginning of the war. Although James I was led by the motto of ''beauti pacifi'' (Blessed be the peacemakers) and did not wish to be involved in any kind of conflict whatsoever, England was compelled to take sides. One of this war's causes was the nearly tacit public opinion, as well as the Parliament's, that they should support the Protestants due to Elizabeth (James's daughter) and Frederick - both involved in the war. The people and monarchy started to disagree, resulting into a loss of balance in the whole land. Catholics also earned themselves a bad image due to the gunpowder plot, once again creating a scarce relationship between them and the Protestants. However, it's common logic that the situation would be conflictual, as two forms of Christianity were impossible to coexist. As it was nearly impossible for James to neglect the conflicts, he attempted to marry his son Henry to a Spanish princess (dynastic marriage), the scope being to bring Protestants and Catholics at peace. All was followed by the death of Henry, which led James to try and marry his other son, Charles. The English economy was later helped by the Treaty of London, involving Spain, but also helped repair the view on Catholics. In conclusion, England was most certainly destabilised by the religious conflicts, though somehow tamed by James's strategic diplomatic moves, proving that he was not such a reckless king after all. Obviously, the conflicts were still there and did shake England's grounds more than a little, as the Thirty Year War commenced, but the King's delicacy in handling the entire unstable situation was one worthy of
Open Document