The financial approach was a tough period in finance; with a King that wanted to spend and go to war, and Wolsey had no choice but to bow to his majesty’s request. Wolsey was to follow on the financial policy of an extremely successful monarch with finances, in Henry VII. Wolsey’s balance sheet was a mixture of successes and failures; his aim was to manage the finances so that King’s policies were still affordable. He found a good source of income to raise funds for the French war. This was the largest tax ever and was extremely significant in Wolsey’s financial campaign; Henry would most likely not have raised the funds for the war given his lazy demeanour, leaving the monarchy in a large debt.
This view is largely accredited because Pitt came into office in a difficult time but events around him seemed to benefit him rather well. Britain was entering the industrial revolution at the time, industry rose up and trade would boom due to expansion of the industries at home and abroad, the advancements of technology meant that Britain was going through a natural change that arguably Pitt was able to captain through leading to better fortunes. The natural opposition from the Whig party against the king led by Charles Fox meant that Pitt naturally had the Kings support against any opposition which could be thrown at him, the king would back him up. The American Revolution and his lack of connection to it meant that he was seen as a new politician not one of the previously failed governments who’s lack of control and rule in a situation. And lastly the regency crisis of 1788 meant that Pitt could use this to gain favour with the king and gather support from his own party and draw it away from the opposition.
(30) During the personal rule of Charles I he was able to finance his government effectively to a certain extent. Schemes such as tonnage and poundage and isolation foreign policies helped bring in huge amounts of revenue and cut costs, but were only effective during the earlier parts of personal rule. As his rule went on opposition towards his policies slowly but surely grew. The public reaction following the John Hamden case and the parliamentary grievances starkly highlight this. Thus Charles was only able to effectively finance his government during the initial years of his personal rule, however as resentment grew towards his governance it had a direct impact on his ability to run and finance his regime.
It can be implied from this that Wolsey had the ability to obtain Henry’s annulment, but failed due to his lack of effort and his half-hearted approach. Furthermore, source 1 supports this view, first implying once again that Wolsey had good contacts and that he had the ability to influence them, “Stafileo has changed his opinion”. However, a lack of effort can still be seen here as he only instructed Stafileo of the facts. It is likely that source 2 is more reliable than source 1 as it was a letter written by the Duke of Suffolk who was not directly involved in the ‘Great Matter’. As the source is also from a letter, it is unlikely the Duke of Suffolk would not have feared angering Wolsey as otherwise the letter would have been private.
You would have to rely on the patient giving you the information for it not is socially desirable or have demand characteristics. On the other hand, it is better than individual differences as people may have the same thought patterns and processes. You can only obtain this information by self reports, which would probably give both of those issues; social desirability and demand characteristics. These would affect your results and therefore they would not be reliable or valid. If you were using the cognitive approach you would only get qualitative data which could be a problem as not everyone interprets the same answer in the same way.
Would changes of outline been made? A few practices examined inside Chapter 1 were exemplified all through this case, for example, groupthink, dissemination of obligation, spectator unresponsiveness, speculation toward oneself, still, small voice and good judgment. The substitution configuration was impractical to finish for the timetable of conveyance that was guaranteed to clients. Since Lawson brought the issue to Warren's consideration, he denied the outline being the reasonable justification. Once Lawson went to Sink, it place him in a troublesome position.
Despite the conclusion was rated as effective or, the result of the statistical test was scored as significant; within this brief timing, the effectiveness or accuracy is questionable. Regardless the study accomplished blinding the participants whether to the treatment or placebo group (Lee and Crockett, 1994, as cited in Griffiths and Mimura, 2003); its result was still in doubt because assertive skills demand practice to be mindful and skillful in order to be effective. Without a reasonable duration for the subjects to obtain the concept of assertive skills, the outcome is dim. It is easy to imagine the extra stress on the
Direct signals are signals that are measurable in terms of validity and reliability. The conclusion is then derived based on precise information. An example of a direct signal is, when the government of Bahrain decides to increase salaries in the public sector by 25% and encourages the private sector to increase their salaries as well. An increase in salaries will boost the confidence of business owners regarding their sales, since more income increases a person’s will to spend, and money will be circulated more frequently. Therefore, this means that the average Bahraini disposable income will significantly increase, hence, they will increase spending on goods and services.
This is where one gains a sense of logic and perception. Logic is the art of reasoning and perception is immediate awareness. For example, if a situation occurred and I made a decision based solely on my views, the probability that I would not make an assessment conducive to each person that the decision affects is high. In making a critical decision one would involve a combination of the six characteristics outlined in the first paragraph along with logic and perception; a non-critical thinker would make a decision based on their own perception. Most of us believe we possess good critical thinking skills.
This combination of the rule of law and the material facts is known as the ratio decidendi. ADVANTAGES | DISADVANTAGES | FAIRNESS like cases treated alike | COMPLEXITY Vast number of precedents, not necessarily all reported | CONSISTENCY Strengthens system, allows some predictability | INFLEXIBILITY May reduce freshness