We were given the right to have the freedom to do what we please. These rights must be secured, not distorted to benefit the needs of our parents. When our rights have been obliterated, it is our right, to disobey the laws of mankind. We must go beyond what we normally would to take a stand. We must institute a relationship where it is the right of the children to alter or abolish the rules and regulations that we find offensive.
I view overcoming estrangement as a path towards conformity because overcoming estrangement requires abolishing our freedom and liberty, our free will. Tinder states we can perhaps hope to achieve harmony and understanding, if human beings are not estranged in essence. He also believes that it would not make sense to say that some people are estranged in essence and others are not. The great historical thinker Thomas Hobbes has argued that human beings are estranged in essence. This question presses on us from different sides and has been the reasoning for philosophical thinkers such as, Thomas Hobbes to shed light on this question, throughout this time; this is not only a question it is an issue in our world today as much as years ago.
When a dilemma arises, my responsibility is to support individuals or their families to make informed choices. Even if I disagree with their decision, I can only give advice but can not force them. If an individual is willing to do something that involves some risk, I have to support people to make informed choices. Totally avoiding risks would limit individual’s choices and opportunities and it can lead to dependency and depression. I have to act in the person’s best interest but instead of encouraging them to avoid risks I have to support them and enable them to taking part in activities.
An individual care plan must be followed, if it is in place, it is a prescription for services, and funded as such. To deviate from an individual's care plan goes against their personal objectives and therefore is not billable. Staff who support the individual have participated in proposing the plan and are invested in serving them to achieve their outcome. Person-centred approach puts the person's goals and what matters to them at the forefront and their desires, strengths and abilities are all factored in. It is the approach that service agencies are trending towards naturally and the funding agencies have followed suit and reinforced that is the way to serve an individual.
“ Laws are made not to be broken, but to curb our savagery” - Toba Beta According, to Toba beta, “ Laws are made not to be broken, but to curb our savagery”. This thought shows how laws play a major role in human’s life. If there are laws made for people, there are some limitations and restrictions(DC,IC). Its limits person’s activities. Limitations stop an individual from doing inadequate things and protect us from evil.
I support John Locke because he expressed the radical view that government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property. He explained the principle of checks and balances to limit government power. He favored representative government and a rule of law. He denounced tyranny. He insisted that when government violates individual rights, people may legitimately rebel.
The idea of legal paternalism in ethical reasoning is somewhat of a kind gesture from the Government to try to help individuals from themselves in the assumption that those individuals do not know what is best for them. But, forcing individuals to paternalistic laws in order to protect them is limiting their natural born rights and is unconstitutional. The Government must respect people's choices because respecting individuals choices manifest a respect for them as liberated individuals protected by the constitution of the United States. Government should not interfere with people's personal lives; because
Corey, Corey, and Callanan (1998) expresses values as the “beliefs and attitudes that provide direction to everyday living, whereas ethics pertain to the beliefs we hold about what constitutes right conduct.” (Freegard, 2012) (page #). Simmons 2015 identifies four commonly held values: Autonomy - Ability of the client to make decisions for themselves or to freely choose what they wish to do with their life. This is not an unrestricted right especially in child protection. Nonmaleficence - We don’t do anything to harm other people and workers must refrain from behaviours that might possibly put the clients at risk of harm. Beneficence - Beneficence and nonmaleficence are closely related but beneficence is stated positively as the value of promoting good and enhancing the well-being of others.
However, freedom also has its limitations it may not interfere with other privileges or rights. In order to maintain Jefferson’s philosophy on liberty, a compromise must be made between freedom of expression and censorship. Although people are promised by the Constitution a right to freedom of expression, there are certain boundaries which are never to be crossed. It is the responsibility of the government to preserve the law while supporting the people; for the U.S. democracy is run by consent of the people. A prime example of this controversial issue is the system of television ratings.
This statement is not meant to make us vulnerable to predators. b. Eugene mentions that it is mean to instruct us to be humble of heart so we are not stumbling blocks to unbelievers. c. Self defense is a legitimate action. III: Defensiveness Produces Resentment toward Others A. Think of a time when someone said something to you, or asked something of you, and you became defensive.