Time News Magazine Cover Difference

862 Words4 Pages
Time Magazine’s Cover Differences (Edwards) (Edwards) When a reader typically picks up a magazine such as Time they typically anticipate the news to be factual and fair regardless of where this person may be. If that is the case, why then do America’s covers tend to differ so drastically from the rest of the world? Often times American’s will receive a watered down cover story compared to the rests of the world’s more “hard-hitting” covers. This raises the question: does Time think Americans to be too stupid or squeamish for cover stories that are the same as the rest of the world? Time readers tend to be educated and knowledgeable people, not the sort that would spend an entire Saturday mindlessly watching television but actively engaging themselves in following the news and other events worldwide. Therefore it is to be assumed that these people shouldn’t become uneasy at the site of happenings in other areas of the world. Time claims that they research which cover will sell best in each respective region, does that mean that Americans really are more interested in petty filler pieces than true world events? Time’s December 5th, 2011 issue is a perfect example of the extreme difference between the United State’s cover and the rest of the world. Europe, Asia, and the South Pacific all receive pieces about the world altering Egyptian revolution that helped spark the Arab Spring, a wave of ancient and supressive governements being overthrown by their people in favor of more democratic governements. Meanwhile, Time decided to put an article about how anxiety is supposedly good for people on the cover. Granted both cover articles were included in the magazines, that does not change how vast of a difference there is between cover pages. Presenting these different cover pages to an uninformed person would surely raise the question: are Americans really so egocentric

More about Time News Magazine Cover Difference

Open Document