Write an ‘Analysis’: Analyze the TECHNIQUES used by the author (‘Language’, ‘Purpose’, ‘Audience’, ‘Mode of Development', etc). By analyzing the writer’s techniques you will be able to answer this basic question: Did the author achieve his/her purpose successfully? Don’t forget to justify your answer by citing evidence from the text. 5. Write a ‘Response’: Respond to the writer’s IDEAS (main idea, first) by evaluating them and pointing out whether or not you agree with any of them.
it also means you are very consistent in your writing. consistantly and continuously through your writing you can connect each paragraph somehow, that you can consistenly write concisely as well. you can also consistently write in formal english. you can express yourself clearly and continously through your essay for example. The following paragraphs represent weak and strong examples of coherence.
: Team Get It Doneâ€™s goals were: 1. Complete SAT2 Handbook and assignments as quickly and efficiently as possible. 2. Utilize frequent and positive communication among team members to keep our focus and maintain good communication lines
Presenting information in a concise, efficient manner is another trait of effective communication. This means one should simplify and condense all information given. One should also make sure to clarify expectations and responsibilities of the receiver. Tell them exactly what is expected from them in their execution and offer compelling, persuasive arguments and recommendations. (Bovee,
Thus, your readers could easily follow your story. Below, I’ve written comments in the areas that you need to work on as you revise. Let’s start! Main Idea/Thesis: First, let’s work on strengthening your topic sentence or thesis sentence so the main idea of your paragraph will be clearer to your readers right away. So far, this is what you have: I would just like to talk about how my life has been.
To finish a professional writing, we do understand the needs of our readers. Once we succeed in identifying our readers, thinking about the requirements of audience is essential. Finally, writings should have a standard format for the type of documents. So a professional writing maybe owns these factors. 7.
The answer to the question would be yes, the hypotheses were stated clearly. Next, Dr. Garzon would have a reviewer ask is do these flow clearly from the literature review. The answer again would be yes; it flows clear, is well stated, and has a meaningful purpose. Finally, the forth question is the design appropriate to investigate the hypotheses? Once again, yes, this is a very well written article, it is well presented, it has purpose, and it is clear and easy to
The paper is easy to follow because it is clearly organized and has transitional markers. In addition, precise and lively word choices are combined into balanced, clear sentences. There are few, if any, deviations from standard usage, grammar, and
The results of the hypothesis were accepted. They clearly indicated that highly productive and efficient virtual teams were built on a foundation of confidence that each member will complete their task appropriately and timely with open and clear communication between all members. The individuals