According to Vonnegut , you should fine the subject that you care about In which you in your heart feel other should be care about. This is natural caring which will be the most interesting and teased element; don’t ramble, we may not discuss too widespread because it will make a paragraph out of focus; keep it simple, use simple language in order to the reader easy to understand what you mean; have guts to cut, If a sentence no matter how excellent, don’t afraid to scratch the sentence out if it doesn’t support the subject that you talk about; sound like yourself, no matter what your first language you should treasure it all your life; say what you mean to say, select the most effective words ,and relating words to one another unambiguously; pity the reader , they have to be able to identify thousand of little mark paper and make sense of them immediately; In addition , there are several elements are considered in order to make style in writing , they are :
The memo should be clearly written and organized in direct order, beginning with the objective and then systematically and covering the vital bits of information (Rentz, 2008). Bad spelling, illogical punctuation, awkward wording are not accepted. Such errors reflect on the writer. Therefore, they can reflect on the credibility of the message. An error-filled message strongly suggests the writer’s ignorance.
So that when he does, he can understand the book better. That is one of the things that Their Eyes were Watching God lacked, making it a good story, but not a great book. One instance proven by Wright is when he says, “Turpin’s faults as a writer are those of an honest man trying desperately to say something; but Zora Neale Hurston lacks even that excuse. The sensory sweep of her novel carries no theme, no message, no thought”( ¶ #5). When he says there is “no thought” he means that there is nothing in the book that makes the reader think.
Dissoi Logoi contains opposing arguments that can be argued either way. Its relevance to Rhetoric is that it allows us as readers to see that no argument can be made both bad and good, just and unjust, seemly and shameless. In our own minds we know right versus wrong, but not everyone has the same vision of what is right and what is wrong. What is wrong to one can be right to another and vice versa which appeals to the logos aspect of rhetoric. These notion of contradiction within this writing are rhetoric.
* Avoid being moralistic: “We need to support each other in times of woe.” * Avoid the pronouns “I” and “you”. In a literary analysis, there is no place for these words. The goal of the essay is to analyze the work. Extra tip: The style analysis essay is about an author’s style. Therefore, a high-level essay is about Richard Wright’s choices – he decided to add the imagery, create the characters, choose the words, and make the symbols.
Something I could deal with. A: So that makes it easier to read? M: I know what it’s like. It’s not much that it’s easier to read. It’s more like, you want to read it.
To get a true understanding of what an essay is saying we must look well past what the cover looks like and even past what the words are saying, what we must concern ourselves with is what the author is truly trying to convey. There are often hidden messages in writing that the inexperienced reader often looks over and takes for granted. This is the issue that is at stake with both readings of “A Modest Proposal” by Jonathan Swift and Garret Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics.” We have one essay that is serious in tone while the other appears to be serious in tone at first glance but in reality is far from it. To truly understand what Jonathan Swift is trying to convey in his essay we must first understand the type of writing we have at hand. “A Modest Proposal” is not an essay you could scan over and understand completely what the author is trying to get across.
We are capable to reach every bit of interesting information and appreciate its value according to our conviction. It is up to our judgment to decide whether we discard the information as useless or the opposite. But David McCullough claims that learning is totally different from the dry knowledge information has to offer. It indicates civilization through poetry, art, or religious texts. On the contrary the memorization of data is never enough and facts alone can rarely lead to the objective truth.
To Think Is To Be Free “Don’t You Think It’s Time To Start Thinking,” by Northrop Frye is about Frye’s critical beliefs that society is unable to properly think. He believes that a person can’t just come up with an idea in there head and call it thinking. They have to analyze that so called “thought” and put it into proper terminology for it to then be considered thinking. In my opinion Frye is way too critical; thinking is a form of expression that is not public for anyone to criticize. There are people such as inspiring scholars and poets who come up with wonderful ideas on a daily basis and then put their ideas into context in a way that others don’t understand, they know how to think.
This papers aims to break down and make simpler some of the concepts around the existential-humanistic approach. This is so that the concepts make sense to any lay individual who wants to understand the approach. Initially an overview of the origins of existential approach will be discussed, followed by a discussion of the main themes of the tradition. The same will ensue for the humanistic approach and then as a final point, the incorporated values, beliefs and practices of both approaches will be combined and it will be shown how the pooled resources work within the person-centered counselling model developed by Rogers. It is probably not surprising that it is difficult to capture the essence of the