Theory of Knowledge : Morality Behind Murder

631 Words3 Pages
THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE Morality behind murder, the question of what is right, what is moral and what is wrong in the face of certain situations isnt always black and white. Our assumptions behind moral reasoning are often contradictory. This contradicting moral reasoning is explored by Proffessor Michael Sandel, who presents a hypothetical scenario with follow up moral conundrums which make the decision all the more difficult. The first case is of a trolley car driver who finds that the brakes of the trolley car has failed and who is in the helpless situation where he would kill five workers on the track if the trolley car ran straight ahead or kill one worker working on an adjacent track by turning the steering wheel onto the side track. The moral thing, I feel, to do would be veering onto the side track and killing the one worker. It seems morally wrong to take away five innocent lives when you can only take away one. Life is precious and wiping out five lives does not seem right. The same principle is used in many real life situations. For example, During the 9/11, as one student mentioned, the pilot chose to save lives by crashing the plane and expending the fewer lives of the passengers in the plane rather than crashing on high rise building and taking away a much larger amount of lives. This reasoning is an example of consequentalist moral reasoning which says that the right thing to do would depend on the consequences that will result from our actions. For the greater good, that is five lives we are willing to sacrifice the one life of the worker working on the side track. However this reasoning has its share of flaws as well. Just for the sake of the greater good, we are taking away one life, which is precious too. That other worker would have his family, friends and loved ones who wouldnt have wanted to lose him. I find this a little selfish as well

More about Theory of Knowledge : Morality Behind Murder

Open Document