Theory Critique Anderson

784 Words4 Pages
Theory Critique of Neil Anderson The Bondage Breaker December 4, 2011 Neil Anderson’s (2006) The Bondage Breaker presents a theoretical model intended to overcome habitual sins, negative thoughts, and irrational feelings. This critique looks into the theoretical and theological approach of this orientation as well as compares the work of Hawkins (2009b), and explains some strengths and weaknesses. Overview of theoretical orientation and process In his book, Anderson (2006) suggests some of the mental illnesses people have are demonic possessions. One of which is the most severe is schizophrenia. Secular psychiatry would dismiss this notion and classify the behavior as deranged or mentally disturbed. They would not consider one being possessed by demonic spirits. Anderson (2006) takes this issue in the development of his theory. God forbids mankind from using spiritual sources “Do not turn to mediums or spiritists…” (Leviticus 19:31; 20:6, 27, pp. 127-128). Satan uses lies to gain the attention of people as he temps them (p. 42). This action can be counteracted by Christ and the freedom that comes with His unconditional love. Christ offers freedom with the redemption of sin. Anderson (2006) writes on seven steps to freedom in Christ. The steps begin with prayer and declaration. Step one is the renouncing of all occult practices. This is called: counterfeit verses real (pp. 201-209). Step two: deception verses truth begins with a prayer from Psalms 139:23, 24. This prayer should be spoken out aloud (pp. 209-221). In step three, bitterness verses forgiveness, one needs to forgive others so not to allow Satan advantages on us (pp. 221-225). Step four involves rebellion verses submission. Mankind must understand that obedience goes beyond convenience (pp. 225-228). Pride verses humility is step five. God is angered with pride, as it declares “I don’t need

More about Theory Critique Anderson

Open Document