That is to say, being smart is not equal to having and using only one type of intelligence, but having all types of intelligences which include practical, social and emotional intelligences as well as using them effectively. On the other hand, the definition of human intelligence may not be a simple one as it cannot be confined to one’s responses to numerical and verbal tasks in IQ tests. Human intelligence is beyond IQ tests as Phil Yam points out. Human intelligence is the combination of various skills and abilities that would work even in real-life conditions. People’s life success and practical knowledge are also determining factors while measuring their intelligence because they need to possess survival skills when they encounter stressful and challenging situations.
All children can now receive state education up until the age of 18, meaning they are better educated and can achieve much higher in adulthood, whilst experiencing a longer period of youth. All of these changes have improved the experience of childhood and cause Functionalists to believe that things are getting better. However, Marxist and Feminist sociologists disagree, claiming that the march of progress view is too positive. They believe that a child’s experience of childhood depends on their class, ethnicity and gender, and that Functionalists overlook the inequalities between these factors. This is called the ‘conflict’ view.
Creativity is defined as the use of the imagination or original ideas, especially in the production of an artistic work (website). It is also defined as the ability to produce something new through imaginative skill, whether a new solution to a problem, a new method or device, or a new artistic object or form (Webster dictionary). In my opinion creativity is thoughts and ideas of a product or services that will produce an innovative item or service that will operate or that so one will use to produce objects, or services. The state legislators voted that preschool children should have acquired many basic skills before starting kindergarten. The idea I imagine would be the easiest way to prepare them for these skills would be to create a list and chart of what they should know this would be my idea example of creativity.
THOUGHT PATTERNS FOR A SUCCESSFUL CAREER® PX2® HIGHER EDUCATION COURSE OVERVIEW Looking Forward Safely Personal Beliefs Inventory Please read each statement and place a check in the box that most accurately describes your beliefs and/or feelings. | | Strongly Agree | Agree | Mildly Agree | No Opinion | Mildly Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree | 1 | When I enter a new situation, I typically see others as smarter than me. | x | | | | | | | 2 | My past successes are due to luck. | | | | | | | x | 3 | I expect to be successful in life. | | x | | | | | | 4 | When life events are difficult, I can adapt.
The real way to measure intelligence is to teach someone something and them pick it up and understand it without being taught most people won’t know much about it. There are different types of theories for the early and contemporary intelligence. Some of the early theories where Charles Spearmen the use of mental energy he is saying that
He argues that priming effects have some effects on how someone performs. I don’t agree with this because IQ plays a factor when considering how smart a person is not just based on if they were primed to be. Because in many cases that I have seen some people just have the ability to learn quicker and better than others no matter how much practice or help they get. I really liked the chapter where he talks about having a picture in your mind. I think he does a good job of describing how the verbal overshadowing works in terms of processing images and our
The eight distinctive intelligences consist of; linguistic, musical, naturalist, logical-mathematical, bodily-kinesthetic, spatial, interpersonal and intrapersonal (Kowalski, R. and Westen,D., 2011). “Gardner’s theory indicates how intelligence rests on eight curves, therefore, one for every different category of intelligence” (Kowalski & Weston, 2011). Gardner believed that people were not limited to a single intelligence and that people were capable of using much different intelligence at the same time to better understand the environment that people are surrounded by (Chapman).
Word count 2093 “A PERSONALISED INDUCTION WILL ALWAYS BE MORE EFFECTIVE” Discuss. Base your answer on theoretical concepts and techniques presented in class. In order to discuss the statement “A personalised induction will always be more effective” we first have to agree that inductions can be tailored specifically to individual clients. Based on the premise that the brain processes information received through our different senses, and we as individuals favour different translations of this information through different modalities as explained in the following essay, I would agree that creating an induction that allows for these translations of information, and tunes into a particular individual, will be more successful than simply applying a universal PMR. This might appear overly simplified taking the complex nature in which the brain processes information, but it is generally agreed that the brain takes information via a visual cortex, auditory cortex and an olfactory cortex.
Provide a brief overview of Gardner’s theory and its significance. The multiple intelligences theory was developed by Harvard psychologist, Howard Gardner in 1983. This theory gives seven ways that people understand and perceive the world. This theory also suggests that there are ways of testing for intelligence based on that certain individual. Gardner claims that all human beings have multiple intelligences.
Believing that intelligence was mainly (though not exclusively) a matter of having the right genes, Galton reasoned that superior intelligence would be a reflection of superior physical development of brain and body; if so, then simple physical measures might provide a reliable index of intellectual prowess. To investigate this possibility, he set about measuring a variety of physical variables, such as reaction time and grip strength, and looked for a correlation between these measures and measures of success in endeavors thought to reflect intellectual ability, such as one's class rank in school or one's occupational level. Unfortunately for Galton's hypothesis, no such relationship was evident, and Galton's attempt must be counted a