Theoretical View Of Tarantino's Cut

4607 Words19 Pages
Kill Bill Kill Bill is a movie which is famous for its martial arts extravaganza. Looking at Quentin Tarantino’s (who is the director and writer of Kill Bill) previous films it has observed that he is always concerned in action rather than any other thing in the movie. Time juggling in a movie is Tarantino’s typical style of directing and writing. Tarantino shoots it with a style that is fun to watch rather than grasping horror. The movie in all has done well. Steve Neale Steve Neale writes a lot about genre of a cinema. His discussions in the essay “Questions of Genre” include issues, concepts and concerns arising from work on genre. He says the concept of the acceptance of the truth is the main thing in understanding genre. There are certain things that make up the genre of the film, without even seeing the film the poster tells the genre of the film. It is true that there is an understood mutual agreement before even going to the movie between the audience and the film that the audiences have to accept the rules of the genre which eventually sets expectations from that particular film. Like if the narrative of the film is musical so it is understood that the characters of the film will start singing in every other scene in order to give either a narrative or a psychological motivation. In the middle of the every scene the singing sequence erupts which actually tells the crux of the scene. So in a musical film eruption of a song in the middle of the narrative is believable and is accepted by the audiences but it would be highly unacceptable in the horror, war or a thriller movie. Same goes with the narrative of a war film, there has to be a war sequence in the movie and the entire movie will be based on a war. Kill Bill mixes number of different and distinct genres in each of the chapters. It shows a glorious smorgasbord of Spaghetti Western, Japanese Samurai
Open Document