All the jobs created by General George Washington and President George Washington, and President Jefferson, and the other Founders were government jobs such as the ones listed in the Question. Washington and Jefferson didn't create private sector jobs since they were both Southerners who held innocent men and women in captivity and forced them to work for no money. But then something funny happened that Washington and Jefferson never imagined: the Industrial Revolution, and the rise of the mega cities. So, by the time you get to President Theodore Roosevelt, most of the American people--including President Theodore Roosevelt (who was a Republican)--realized that the freedom and liberty of big corporations had to be limited. Big corporations were concentrating way too much wealth and political power into the hands of a very few Americans.
Besides that Cheddi Jagan was a communist, John F. Kennedy did not have a valid reason to overthrow the British Guiana government. Kennedy was resolute in his decision and sought to deny Jagan and the PPP any power. Cheddi Jagan won the 1961 elections against the socialist Forbes Burnham, who Kennedy supported. Jagan’s victory made Kennedy believe that the country would allow for the growth of communism in the Western Hemisphere. Despite the United States’ concerns for the creation of a communist country, the British were unwilling to interfere.
I don’t believe he was ever violent with his war protests. The only thing in my opinion that could have been argued that John Lennon was endangering was the image of the government which made them feel threatened. I feel that John Lennon did a very good job of how he handled his opposition and I don’t believe he could have gone about it another way while staying peaceful. In my opinion I think the government handled the John Lennon situation very poorly, John only demonstrated peaceful protest, and he never harmed anyone. The government tried to have John Lennon deported on a charge that they dug up from his past in his country.
The war had caused the USA and the USSR to become the new superpowers of the world. They had been allies in the defeat of Germany but with different ideologies, suspicions grew and conflicts began. The USA was democratic in that the public elected people from different parties whereas the USSR was a one party dictatorship where people could only vote for communists. This meant that everything was owned by the state and every one’s individual rights were closely controlled as they believed the most important thing was the good of society as a whole. This differs to the USA, who was Capitalist, which meant private individuals owned industry and kept the profits.
(Haass, 2009) If war is the only answer to save lives, yes it is justifiable not matter the time or the place. When innocent people are being used as pawns for some deranged individual's advantage. Yes war is justifiable. With this reason being by far the most important, according to Richard N. Haass, President, Council on Foreign Relations, the first Iraq war was justifiable, the second was not. Haass argued that "the United States could have done more to contain Saddam though strengthening sanctions.
As Milton Friedman said, the social responsibility of a business is to increase profits, then Union Carbide Corporation’s decision to approve the cost-cutting plan seems appropriate and acceptable. Friedman’s view, however, is far from universally accepted. Many believe that corporations’ responsibilities to their shareholders, employees, customers and communities extend past fiduciary and enter the realms of ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility. Egoism fully applies to Union Carbide because to them no one else matters except for their happiness and profit . What Union Carbide failed to see was without the employees and the local community , there will not be profit because how can a corporation run without people to help it function or run .
It just goes back to what I stated previously about people complaining and then not doing anything about whatever is bothering them. I see it as in this country, we are actually taught to be lazy and not work for anything, that we should just receive something without expending any effort. Which is why I do not care whether the illegal immigrants are “taking” all the jobs away from actual United States citizens. Most people would not step up and take the jobs the illegals do, so how can they be taking jobs away? Illegal immigrants work the hard jobs in this country as they take the jobs that they can get.
Federal courts were required to police prisons and keep them from cruel and unusual punishments. It's not "judicial activism" when federal judges have to enforce the U.S. Constitution. Within conservative ranks, the social conservative law and order crowd completely dominated the libertarians who said illegal drugs should be legalized. For years, not one state stepped forward to give this a chance, nor did the federal government much loosen its grip on all 50 states in this regard. The laboratory of federalism and states' rights had little room to experiment in the face of the all-powerful federal government.
The definition of justified war is not self-explanatory nor can it be understood without delving into the ideas and concepts that lie behind it. “The theory is not intended to justify wars but to prevent them, by showing that going to war except in certain limited circumstances is wrong, and thus motivate states to find other ways of resolving conflicts” (“Just War Introduction”). The development of the theory on just war was not a one-step process. Numerous theological ideas and phases of development transpired to result in the Just War Theory. Other views on how to deal with conflict were in existence, such as pacifism and realism.
The US felt they had no other choice but to act on their policy of containment and fear of the Domino Theory. The Vietnam War also brought about worries of the Domino Theory, as communism was already present in the North, and so they wished to prevent it from spreading to neighboring countries e.g. Laos and Cambodia and evidently also the South. This is the main reason as to why the Americans began to become involved in the Vietnam War. Therefore, the Vietnam War can be said to be part of the Cold War due to the Americans acting upon their policy of containment and fear of the Domino Theory.