The Years 1924-1929 Saw Political Stability and Economic Recovery. How Far Do You Agree with This View?

409 Words2 Pages
In my opinion, the period of 1924 - 1929 is often seen as the high point of the Weimar Republic. This interpretation is also heightened by the fact that the period before it (1919-1923) was filled with the crisis and chaos of rebellions, political assassinations and hyperinflation. Also, the political and economic uncertainty that followed in 1929-1933 added to this description. However, the fact that such rapid disintegration followed after 1929 has lead many historians to believe that the Republic was, in-fact, not so stable at all. This suggests to me that there are possible factors which may appoint me to disagree with this view. In order to see whether I agree or disagree, certain factors of political stability and economic recovery can show me evidence. The biggest difference occurring during this period appeared to be the economic recovery. The Dawes Plan was introduced, which saw Germany receiving an 800million gold mark loan. This meant that they were able to pay off the reparations over a longer period of time. It could also invest in new projects such as housing and roads. Factories were re-equipped and built, also new roads and railways were built, as well as nearly 3 million new homes. The Young Plan of 1929 further reduced reperations payments, which were to be paid over a period of 58 years. This meant that Germany had a long period of time to pay back the reperations, causing less harm to the economy and political stability. This evidence are reasons for recovery. I agree with this view as there were many factors, as shown above, that make me feel the recovery was affective. On the other hand, evidence shows that many people may disagree with the recovery of the Weimar Republic. Political recovery had against factors as the basic problems of the constitution remained. No ones party could secure a majority in the Reichstag and there were frequent,
Open Document