The Ways We Lie Analysis

1098 Words5 Pages
Stephanie Ericsson says [in her essay “The Ways We Lie”]. We cannot live in this world without lying in almost every kind of situation. All we do is lie and it hurts people, but wait she also says that we just go around telling everyone the truth on everything all the time either. Sure some lies are worse than others like the bold face that people tell us even we saw them comfit the said crime. There are some lies that are not as noticeably offensive as others such as the white lie that we tell people to keep them from being hurt by the truth. How do we know what they can handle and what they can’t handle? Ericsson classifies the different kinds of lies. I don’t agree with all of Ericson’s classifications of lies. Her classifications are; The white lie, facades, deflecting, ignoring the plain facts, stereotypes and clichés, omission, group think, dismissal, out-and-out lies and delusion. Ericsson’s interpretation of white lies I particularly don’t agree with. The whole point of a white lie is to keep people from being hurt by the truth like telling a little kid that Santa Claus is real. I’m not 100 percent disagree with Ericsson about white lies. Ericsson says that white lies are a sign of arrogance judging whether someone is capable of handling the truth. Saying that a white lie is a sign of arrogance is a little drastic in my eyes. I see a white lie as more in the grey area, between the judging what others can hear and arrogance. It is true that some people really just can’t handle being told the truth or their innocents from being damaged. Young children on Christmas who have a 100% belief in Santa Claus is a perfect of a situation where some people who shouldn’t be told the truth. But there is a big difference between shouldn’t knowing the truth and not being able to handle the truth. Sometimes knowing the truth hurts, and that’s why
Open Document