Nayar society groups were based on the wife’s relatives and marriage did not play a part in how the households worked or how the children were brought up. This proves that a family does not need to be nuclear in order to be fully
Marriage is the most important social institution, and it is a formality for the perpetuation of procreation; hence same sex marriage cannot meet this requirement. In other words, same sex marriage does not aid in procreation, which sustains our species. Same sex marriage will destroy our society. Some believe that although gay couples cannot produce children, they can have adopted children and fulfill a social need. That may seem like a good idea, but I am sure that there must be differences between a child who grows up in an environment with same sex couples than with regular heterosexual parents.
The book indicates that a single-parent “has been demonstrated not to affect children’s cognitive and emotional functioning (Foster & Kalil, 2007). However, I believe that conflicts found in a single-parent household may not be linked to the parent who has raised their children, but they can be associated with other things related to single parenting. Normally when there is only one parent, the family is often less financially stable which is the main reason for many family problems. Also, lower education levels and lower economic achievements have been associated with effects of coming from a low income family. It is also true that these children are less supervised because they don’t receive the time and communication from their parents.
On the contrary, colonists immigrating to the Chesapeake region tended to be younger and traveled overseas alone instead of in families. Settlers were mainly men, with very few women making the voyage to America. As a result of the lack of women in the Chesapeake,
History of Concern or Need Client states that a little over a year ago her husband passed away, and since that time she has had a difficult time maintaining the bills on just her income. Client states that she is behind on mortgage. Client also reports that the family was without electric for a week until she received her paycheck. I observed that there is very little food in home. When asked if client attempted to receive help from any community agency, Client reports that she was unaware that she could receive help and that she thought food stamps were for people who did not work.
He says that childhood isn’t natural or defined by biology. By this he means that although all children go through life stages and physical development, it doesn’t create their position in society and instead the society and its differential culture, religion and laws decide this for them. Earlier centuries like the middle ages didn’t regard childhood at all and adults and children were almost equal with each other, work, clothing and playing. As item A describes ‘little distinction was drawn between adults and children’. This is a view taken up by the historian Philippe Aries where the child entered the wider society on most the same terms as adults and taking the responsibility of work from a young age.
However, the Supreme Court has ruled that the "State has a somewhat broader authority to regulate the activities children than of adults”(Fourteenth Amendment...). Children are afforded the same constitutional guarantees against government deprivations in the same manner that adults are protected. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has given three reasons why the constitutional rights of children should not be equated with the rights of adults. First, the State is entitled to "adjust its legal system to account for children’s vulnerability" (Fourteenth Amendment...). Second, the State may limit the freedom of children because an assumption is made that children, unlike adults, lack the ability to make critical decisions in an informed, mature manner.
An effective way of including an individual is to not upset them or make them feel unwelcome by following stereotypes or assuming something about an individual based on their social identity. Taking time to respond to everyone individually, and show them that you recognise them as an individual, including them into the group rather than having the group addressed to as a whole. That stands for lots of things, such as treating people fairly may not mean treating them in the same way, giving out ice cream to everyone is not treating the members of the group that may be diabetic fairly, and as a result is not including them. 2.3 describe ways in which discrimination may be challenged in adult social care settings. Within a residential home it is important to know that you have a duty of care to challenge and remove discrimination in any form.
The solution could be placing the child with a family of a different race. Critics of interracial adoption will say that parents who adopt children of different ethnicities are not capable of caring or educating the child simply because of the cultural differences. The critics opinion has merit in the since that the parents cannot teach the child to be their race but they can provide love and raise them to be responsible adults. In the end we must consider which is more important, being able to find a child a loving family when race is not a factor or waiting for an indefinite time to try to find a family of the same race. If you are thinking about which is more important remember that for every twenty children who are in foster care at least nine of them wait an extended amount of time to be adopted.
The amendments adopt a confusing process of non-confidential parenting coordination that allows testimony on the basis of recommendations about long-term parenting arrangements made during a process designed to help parties resolve parenting issue, with no compliance with custody evaluation standards or with the statutory duties of a guardian ad litem. Mandating the admissibility of such unreliable evidence may violate the due process rights of the parents if courts rely on such testimony in making decisions. Likely, clients will not understand the process choices or have adequate informed consent of the perils of making admissions against interest to such individuals or being seen as noncompliant and non-cooperative from the PC’s perspective. 2. The amendments require disclosure by the parenting coordinator, whether confidential or otherwise, of the substance of any communication by a participant, such as a lawyer for one of the parties, to all the other parties and lawyers, so that effectively there can be no caucus style communication, proven to be a very effective tool in mediation of parenting issues.