rejection by entering into a substitute transaction, he is excused from performance obligations B. Determined by Little condition is not completely within the promisor's control C. Sufficient cause An agreement that gives one party an unfettered right to terminate at any time will be interpreted to require “reasonable notice,” thus placing a limitation on that party's freedom sufficient to satisfy the consideration requirement 1. Certain terms (open) buyer is constrained to request amounts that are not unreasonably disproportional there is clearly consideration for the modification and it is enforceable the modern rule, an offer for a unilateral contract becomes an option for the offeree 2.
It was also because we had to take two measurements (one for diameter another for height)...which could possibly create more mistakes. Furthermore, you need to multiply diameter and height to get to the volume, so any one of those reading had a mistake, the error would compound and get worse. The same is not true with measuring with graduated cylinder, which is just a one shot reading. If that reading is off a bit, it won't impact the density as much 2- Did you find that density was intensive or extensive? Explain A- It was intensive.
No man or woman is beyond the responsibility for acts committed during their watch – even if they were not directly responsible for the act itself. If there is any informal guideline to follow in the performance of your duties, it has always been “do the right thing at the right time.” A mantra drummed into the heads of all naval personnel by generations of unheralded Chief Petty Officers who serve as the supervisory backbone of the Navy and the carriers of its rich traditions. The fastest way to get action on the docks or underway is to ask the Chief. While military courtesy (RHIP - Rank Hath Its Privileges) is strictly observed, it does not extend to making allowances for shirking one’s formal or informal obligatory duties. Therefore, when the following story was released by the Navy, I, once again, was positive that the other services need to modify their organizational behaviors along Navy lines.
Why or why not? I do not think it is important to know the exact age of the earth, but you should have a
In this paper, I will argue that, though Nagel's theory makes sense, there are still holes in such an argument. Nagel argues that there is luck in the designation of responsibility for certain actions. We can be held responsible for certain actions outside of our control. He shows this by expanding on the concept of moral luck and presenting various ways that luck can contribute to the morality of an action. For example, Nagel argues that a combination of negligence and luck can cause someone to be morally responsible for actions outside of their control.
GKE Task 1 (0913) Top of Form | value: 0.00 | value: 1.00 | value: 2.00 | Score/Level | Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) | The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. | The candidate provides weak articulation of response. | The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. | | A. Development of Societies | The candidate does not provide a logical justification of 1 significant environmental or physical geographic factor that contributed to the development of 1 early human society from the given list.
According to both rules, the sample size is small. (d) Why might collinearity account for the lack of significance of some predictors? Collinearity refers to a strong correlation between two variables. This strong correlation makes it difficult or impossible to estimate their individual regression coefficients reliably (Statistics.com, 2010). In this case rebounds and points are highly
If this was the case, genuine events would be very rare. While Percy is correct to believe that experiences are authentic if one has had no prior preconceived notions, life reveals that deepest experiences can also occur when expectations are surprisingly wrong. Walker Percy poses a rational argument to the reality behind life occurrences.
However, I do not find the argument to be that convincing. After reading this argument, I did not find it to have stimulated my mental capacities. However, based on what it has presented, the argument is valid and most of all makes sense because it originates from definitions that provide a solid base for the argument. The objections to this argument do raise several valid points to the concept of whether or not the “maximally great” being in question does have a universal position across all the worlds he may or may not exist in. What if there is no level of “maximal greatness” in one world?
The real world very rarely approaches this ideal. In the real world, explanatory variables that you expect to be statistically significant often aren’t significant. Variables you expect to be cointegrated often aren’t cointegrated. Coefficients you expect to be positive often turn out to be negative. These results are obtained all the time -- even in the most sophisticated of studies.