Reluctantly, the doctors said it was possible. To decide who would be the one to be eaten, Whetmore suggested they should roll a dice; Upon approval of the idea, Whetmore proceeded to lose the dice throw and was consumed by the remaining explorers. Finally, on the thirty-second day, the survivors were rescued. However, the surviving cave explorers were then indicted for the murder of Whetmore upon being recused. After trials had concluded, the Supreme Court deemed the cave explorers guilty in the murder of Roger Whetmore.
Tarek Aboutouk. July 10 2011. “The Case of The Speluncean Explorers” by Lon L Fuller, is an imaginary scenario where five amateurs interested in the exploration of caves were imprisoned in a limestone cavern. Facing the fear of death by starvation they found that the only way to survive was by consuming the flesh of one of their number. After they were rescued, they were put on trail and found guilty for the murder of Roger Whetmore, and sentenced to be hanged.
G. Whetmore was the explorer who came up with the idea of killing someone in order for the others to survive. H. Whetmore also came up with the idea of rolling dice to decide who would be killed I. After the rescue of the four remaining explorers on the thirty second day the survivors were indicted for the murder of Roger Whetmore. The Issue Is being trapped in a cave with little chance to live an exception to the statute N.C.S.A (N.S.)12-A? The Holding No.
In 1975 Ted was arrested in Utah but was released due to the little evidence, Two years later was convicted of kidnapping and escaped. Ted Bundy killed three people in Florida and was arrested but his parents bailed him out and he sold his car but police impounded it away from new owner. It was then when forensic evidence finally solved this case by finding three different hairs matching the three victims killed in Ted’s car and matched his teeth marks the a bite mark on one of the victims. He was then was sentenced to three death penalties in 1978 when Ted was recaptured and on January 24, 1989 at Railford prison in Starke, Florida Ted Bundy was executed in the electric chair. My opinion on this case was interesting yet disgusting but Ted Bundy was smart about how he attracted his victims.
The petitioner has not been previously adjudicated guilty of a criminal offense or a comparable ordinance violation nor adjudicated delinquent for committing a felony or a misdemeanor specified in section 943.051(3)(b), Florida Statutes. 4. The petitioner has not secured a prior records expunction or sealing under section 943.0585, or 943.059, Florida Statutes, former section 943.058, Florida Statutes, former section 893.14, Florida Statutes, or former section 901.33, Florida Statutes, or any other law, rule, or authority. 5. (To be used only when requesting expunction.)
It looks like they should kill their enemy, but at the beginning of two stories they didn’t because both barber and the narrator have justice in their heart. “Gregory” is a story about loyalty, friendship and irony. When the narrator’s execution is ordered the guerrilla's must choose between their friend and their loyalty to their country. However, the narrator has to obey the order to kill him. In “Just lather, that’s all”, the barber has a lot of chance to kill Captain Torres but he didn’t.
Adam vs. Oram Moral dilemma is a conflict in which you must choose among two or more events with your own values and standards for judging right and wrong. In the short stories The Firing Squad, by Colin McDougall and Gentlemen, Your Verdict, by Michael Bruce, both authors incorporate a moral dilemma into their stories. Captain John Adam from “The Firing Squad,” and Lieutenant-Commander Oram from “Gentlemen, Your Verdict,” are selfless men. Both characters, Adam and Oram, are facing a problem where they must decide what is right. Captain John Adam is to kill Private Jones for a murder he did not commit; Lieutenant-Commander Oram is to either have his entire crew die or kill fifteen of his men, including himself, to save five married men.
Wargrave uses this poem in a way so that each guest killed dies in a similar way and in order to that of the Indian boys. For example, the last line of the poem reads, “One little Indian boy left all alone; He went out and hanged himself and then there were none.” The final guest to die is Vera Claythorne, who indeed does hang herself, leaving only Justice Wargrave alive on the island. There were several guests who did not deserve the verdict of first degree murder. An excellent example is Emily Brent. The girl she hired, Beatrice, became pregnant before marriage.
Hamlet kills Polonius behind the tapestry because he suspects that it might be Claudius, but when he unveils the body and discovers that it is Polonius, he shows no sign of guilt at all. He acts like he is “convinced that he is the complete master of an obviously unhealthy situation” (Prosser Pg. 125). A person who wants nothing more but justice for the death of a loved one would feel bad for killing an innocent person during the process, but that is not the case with Hamlet. He shows no sign of guilt or remorse towards the death of Polonius, because he is clearly past the point of justice and is seeking revenge.
Aeneas's not-so-nice side reveals itself again in Book 10 and Book 12, when he kills various guys (including, finally, Turnus), who are surrendering and begging him for mercy. OK, so you were really angry that Turnus killed Pallas, but still, don't you remember your father telling you to "spare the conquered"? Is that really the example you want to be setting for your son Ascanius and the countless generations of Romans who will come after him? That was the non-technical sense in which Aeneas is a tool. Interestingly enough, the technical sense makes the non-technical sense seem not as bad.