Drinking and driving is very dangerous and many people have their lives shattered and ruined because of drunk drivers. That is why it is becoming socially unacceptable. People are finally starting to realize how dangerous this can really be. With the help of new laws, and continued hard work, the number of drinking and driving accidents should be very little in the future. Anyone that is caught while intoxicated should never have the right to drive again.
Lewis' experience with the cab driver driving next to him yelling expression is good enough to say the least but his friend being his by the cab drive is criminal. I consider a cab driver angry over a tip road rage and the driver should be placed in jail for attempted murder. I could not imagine a person acting in such a way because a tip was not received. Balancing the interest of both sides was not difficult because there have been times that I could not afford to leave a tip or did not leave a tip for poor service. There have also been times that I have left a substantial tip for excellent service so it was easy to see both sides.
Driving while talking should be banned. When a cell phone goes off in a movie theatre or at a concert it is very irritating but, at least our lives are not endangered. When we are on the road, irresponsible cell phone users are more than irritating; they are putting our lives at risk. When certain kinds of driver behaviors are shown to be especially dangerous, we wisely draft special laws making them illegal imposing specific punishments, so talking on a cell phone in a moving vehicle should be no exception. Many of us have witnessed drivers dialing and talking on cell phones, resembling drunk drivers swerving all over the roads.
Using this logic, citizens would be denied the ability to drive cars because drunk drivers use them to kill people. Rand completely fails to mention that the right to carry concealed firearms is a fundamental attribute of decentralized US crime-fighting initiatives that have made an unambiguously positive impact on society—not only on gun violence—but also on broader crime categories that include murder, rape, and robbery. These benefits are mostly long-term, as any immediate increase in crime after the passage of concealed carry laws is “dwarfed over time by the decrease in crime associated with the post-law trend” (Moody & Marvell, 2008, p. 270). Furthermore, according to data collected by the Violence Policy Center over the last four years, murders committed by “permit-holders amount to fewer than one of every 200 murders. For every
There's all kinds of ways for them to trick you or get around certain situations so that they can bust you for drinking. Most of time officers aren't allowed to enter a house unless a doors open or the owner of the house lets them in. To stop the drinking and driving the cops are more strict and will take you to jail if your under the influence while driving. I think if the drinking age was lowered the problems with under age drinking would not be nearly as high as they are now because of the age being 21. This solution could help solve the problems to stopping drinking and under age kids driving under the influence.
The difference is interinging because not finishing high school is potentially leading to several other important indicators attached to criminal offenders (DeMichelle.3). Multiple SWI offenders are also more likely to lie (DeMichele, 3). This is why you should not believe what any person says about not going to drink and drive again; this is just an attempt to get cops to set them free so they can go home. People who drive while intoxicated are a small group of persistent chronic or career criminals; drunk driving has been rooted in complex processes of social learning as psychological factors that lead up to antisocial attitudes, desires, motives, and rationalizations acceptable for law violations. In general, multiple people who drive while intoxicated those who gave gad four or more prior DUI convictions are more likely to have demonstrated patterns of difficulty following rules, and once they are punished for misconduct, they are more likely to continue with their law-violating behaviors (DeMichele, 3).
Sometimes even normal-seeming registered gun owners appear to go mad and kill, as tragically happened at Hungerford and Dunblaine in the U.K. Quite simply, guns are lethal and the fewer people have them the better. Law-abiding citizens deserve the right to protect their families in their own homes, especially if the police are judged incapable of dealing with the threat of attack. Would-be rapists and armed burglars will think twice before attempting to break into any house where the owners may keep firearms for self-defense. (This can also be applied to the right to carry concealed weapons, deterring potential rapists, muggers, etc), [Gun
Drinking and Driving Jennifer Figg English Composition I South University Drinking and Driving Many Americans have started drinking as an extra-curricular activity, but some take it a little too far when they get behind the wheel of a motor vehicle. Thus far, drinking and driving has become a critical problem that America is facing. It is almost not as shocking to see about motor vehicle accidents on the news, that were caused by a drunk driver and the outcome includes fatal or serious injuries. Not all Americans know the laws, statistics, consequences, or the programs that are available to inform Americans about drinking and driving. Americans do not do enough to keep these drunk drivers off of the roads.
Since teens generally like to be sneaky if they have been doing illegal things, they try to hide being intoxicated. An example of this action would lead to drinking and driving from parties, which leads to fatalities. In most cases, these fatalities come from drunk driving.
Recent studies show that a person driving while talking on a cell phone has less awareness of the road than a person who is driving drunk. So I believe that if someone is caught driving while using their phone, the offense should be treated as a DUI. In order for a person to avoid an accident or anything that could cause harm to someone or something they must have fast reflexes. A person’s reaction time is greatly decrease while driving and using a cell phone. “If you put a 20-year-old driver behind the wheel with a cell, phone their reaction times are the same as a 70-year-old driver who is not using a cell phone,” said University psychology professor David Strayer.