The way that groups interact are important and create these constantly changing human patterns. Culture consists of a system of learned meanings that are universal and determined by insiders.” These systems of meaning generally include the shared religious beliefs, morals, values, ideologies, rituals, and language practiced by a group of people. The people of the Aztec Empire and Spanish Conquistadors that clashed in the early 16th century represented two separate cultures. The differences between the various facets of these two cultures determined the fate of the conflict that destroyed an empire. Culture influenced the thoughts, decisions and behaviors that allowed for a much smaller, limited force of Spanish conquistadors to flawlessly perform the role of conqueror.
Throughout his letter, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. attempts to draw an emotional connection with readers. Returning to the previous quote “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality…Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly” (p. 4), King strengthens his argument by assuming that we (the readers) are rooted somehow in relation to one another, therefore the actions of one (be that positive, or negative) will inevitably affect all. King deepens this emotional connection through the use of perspective, stating
Peace, then, is understood as a continuous process of skillfully dealing with and, whenever possible, preventing or transforming conflict. To manage and resolve conflicts effectively, we must become aware of our attitudes towards conflict and our habitual conflict management styles (competitive, collaborative, avoidant, submissive, etc. ), so as to attain to greater freedom to define our own responses in a proactive and coordinated (as opposed to reactive and incoherent) way. Such awareness increases our chances of achieving "win-win" rather than "win-lose" or "lose-lose" solutions. We learn to understand and work with our own emotions, to generate openness to more authentic communication, and to control processes that might otherwise lead to escalation.
The theoretical point of view is stressed over ethically supporting the war and the structures that battling may conceivably take. The bona fide point of view, or the "basically war custom," deals with the chronicled gathering of principles or understandings that have associated in various wars over the ages. For instance, all-inclusive affirmations, for instance, the Geneva and Hague conventions are bona fide rules went for compelling certain sorts
A Shared Crisis The Middle East continues to be a location largely affected by continuous violence, political unrest; as well as, the uncertainty in the quality of life for residents of these areas. Although each situation is unique in its own right; there are similar themes that connect these crises to one another in ways many may not realize. The Middle Eastern crises share numerous similarities; however, three of the blatant unifying themes are Religion, Political Disorganization, and American Involvement. Religion The most obvious theme throughout historic confrontations has been the feeling of pride that residents of these areas have for their own designated Religion. In fact, one could argue that without differences in religious culture throughout the
Art is good because This pathos and ethos made people, no matter the North or the South, to feel that they are in unity. Both sides were suffering the same war and urged to end it, while they shared a same religion. God plays an important role to connect the people together, which enhances Lincoln’s credibility in his speech besides his position as a president and occasion of this speech. Lincoln ended his speech by claiming that they would “strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations” (Wilhoit 138). This pathos describes how Lincoln would care for his people and how he would put the task of helping the people suffering from the war first, serving as a strong pathos since it is not only emotionally affecting his people, but also encouraging and giving them hope.
What actually is the right way to approach ‘moving on’? It would seem it is engraved in human nature to be selfish and seek revenge, but what does that really lead to? In Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, for instance, King suggests a brotherhood between blacks and whites rather than dwelling on an unequal past. Suu Kyi even illustrates in John Pilger’s, “Icon of Hope” interview, that the people of Burma cannot progress without a degree of openness to diminish a lack of trust with one another. Chiefly, Mandela’s “Inauguration Speech” suggests that everyone is apart of each other, thus proving there needs to be harmony in a relationship of grievance.
Is it possible to hold our values responsible for our reactions towards or received from conflict? This has raised awareness to re-consider the reasoning behind the reactions of conflict and what truly is the driving force for it. Arguably our instincts are to be held accountable more than our values when faced with reacting to conflict, it appears to be more appropriate to suggest that our instinct is what occurs when faced with conflict rather than our ‘values’. Values are more of a safety mechanism that individuals believe in and implement in their life for a positive purpose rather than a reactive mechanism. We have been given insight into the life of two journalists that became involved in the war in Afghan & Iraq to endeavour the truths behind the conflict of these nations and America.
Perseverance and Resilience are born from Conflict Statement of Intention: For this piece I chose to write an essay of the expository form to explore human qualities such as perseverance and resilience and their relationship to conflict. I chose to use casual language but in a formal and sophisticated tone to appeal to all readers. Conflict and its ability to produce internal qualities is a fundamental aspect of the human condition. Conflict provides the necessary framework for growth and progression through the oppression of resistance by a dominant power. Along with its ability to provide development, it also has the capability to establish other qualities such as perseverance and resilience.
“Peace is not absence of conflict, it is the ability to handle conflict by peaceful means,” this quote by Ronald Regan shows that conflict is an inevitable part of society. Conflict is a fundamental part of life and is always present for every individual throughout their everyday life. Encountering conflict means to face or handle conflict and the ways in which we go about trying to resolve it. Different types of conflict can be local, national, religious, political, economic or cultural. There are a number of reasons why conflict occurs; difference in beliefs, morals, religion and values, fear and unmatched expectations.