Is rationale to assume that parental and family risk factors played a vital part in the life of a criminal, because they are a product of their surroundings. Understanding the mental process of a criminal behavior can assist on identify the problems such as antisocial behaviors. It identifies the individuals with their parents and other family members of the family. Taking a look at the parents and siblings will give researcher a different spectrum that can or may not voucher for the actions of the criminal, it brings all the issues about their past to surface. Parental and family risk factors effects and shapes the individual into the person that they are today.
However, the language and form of punishment used to rehabilitate and punish children differs greatly from that used in adult courts (Siegel, 2009). The juvenile court system serves two major functions; keeping juvenile offenders away from the society and rehabilitating or correcting them. Correction helps to hold juveniles accountable to their action by helping them to realize the wrong they have done. In addition, correction facilities help to educating, and imparting social skills among juvenile offenders. Through the correction function of juvenile court system, young offenders are influenced to realize their potential by helping them to build acceptable vocational and interpersonal skills.
Assess the Usefulness of Risk Factors in Managing Youth Offenders. This essay will be attempting to explore the usefulness of risk factors, when it comes to managing young offenders. It will begin by defining the key terms ‘risk factors’ and ‘youth offenders’ before outlining some of the most important risk factors commonly connected with young offenders. It will then attempt to examine the ways in which these particular risk factors are used to identify and then manage those young people who commit crime. The essay will be looking at these risk factors and their effects with particular reference to the Youth Justice System, in addition to other agencies.
Victims and Crime Evaluation Victims and Crime Evaluation From the dawn of human civilization aggression, violence, and mayhem have supported two positions pertaining to confrontation. The first position is the aggressors position. The second is the victims position. Within this writing the concept of the victim will be identified along with the history and significance of victims assistance programs. The purposes of victims assistance programs and the programs functions as applied to the criminal justice system will also be examined, dissected, and highlighted.
Furthermore, the law will be discussed in regards to two major criminological theories; labeling theory and social disorganisation theory. The overall principles for such laws are to increase the public’s ability to protect itself from sexual offenders, especially sexual offences against children. Furthermore, the laws aim to provide the community with information about convicted sex offenders in order to protect the children from sexual abuse, but also to assist with monitoring those who are
Criminal Justice Trends Evaluation Brandon Vines CJA/394 Deborah Blanch November 26, 2013 Abstract This paper will evaluate the past, future, and present trends in the interface between components of the criminal justice system and criminal justice connections with surrounding society. In this paper I will also evaluate, identify, and access the following in my paper: Recent and future trends and contemporary issues affecting the criminal justice system, as well as the value of the criminal justice system in a changing society. Past Trends As we all know, we all rely on the criminal justice system to protect us as a community, and to also enlighten us about what is going on within our communities. Lets face it, every citizen wants to be safe in knowing that he or she can safely walk the streets without facing some type of threat to his or her life. To begin with, the criminal justice system is a field that will forever evolve.
Courts are challenged with an array of factors in establishing an effective system of justice for juveniles that holds juveniles accountable as well as prepares them for reintegration into society as productive citizens. Currently the nation is swept with controversy over Juvenile offenders. Of the many components of Juvenile Delinquency; the main issues raised reflects society’s views on Crime Control versus Due Process and how this pertains to juveniles. Are we incarcerating children into a system that does not hold them accountable? My paper will be an analysis of the juvenile justice system, recidivism rates, and how this process affects the outcome of children and administration in the Juvenile Justice System.
On behalf of victims, we act as liaisons between victims and a variety of justice system departments and personnel. We advocate for victims' needs and wishes within the system and help victims determine which courses of action are best for them. We recognize the impact crime has had on victims, and support the important role victims play in criminal justice processes. We work to ensure victims are treated fairly and respectfully and provide services that lessen the impact of the crime and restore victims' losses. We seek to remove all potential barriers (physical, psychological, cultural, etc.)
Many decisions pertaining to a case going to trial and how actively they pursue the case are left up to prosecutors and how they view the evidence and what the evidence means to them. This can be described as prosecutorial discretion. How does this affect the prosecutor and overall case flow in the criminal court system? Prosecutorial discretion puts an abundance of pressure on the prosecutors and their roles in the courts. The prosecution must without a reasonable doubt prove the defendant is responsible for committing the crime.
Abstract This paper will explore and discuss the difference in opinion regarding crime and who should be held accountable for criminal activity. The views of social responsibility and social problems will be examined, along with the perspectives that each holds to justify their belief. Theories such as Determinate Sentencing that holds the value of social responsibility in response to crime, and also the Constructionist theory that places that blame on society as to why a person commits a crime. In the end I believe that Social/Individual responsibility is the most appropriate way to approach crime. Perspectives of Social Problems and Social Responsibility Within criminology there has been multiple theories suggested to explain the numerous motives behind why crime exists in our world.