The River of Doubt Book Review

697 Words3 Pages
Risk-Taking Roosevelt Resists Ravaging River “If it is necessary for me to leave my bones in South America, I am quite ready to do so," wrote former President Theodore Roosevelt to his friend Frank Chapman, a renowned ornithologist, in 1912. This sentence exemplifies Roosevelt’s near fatal optimism about taking risks, a reoccurring theme in Theodore Roosevelt’s Darkest Journey: the River of Doubt. Roosevelt’s goal was to put the River of Doubt, a thousand-mile long tributary of the Amazon River, on the map. In many ways, Roosevelt and his companions were attempting to complete the geographical survey of South America that Alexander von Humboldt had started over two centuries ago. Candice Millard’s harrowing account of Roosevelt’s 1913 expedition down the River of Doubt is primarily a biography of the former president and his journey, but is also a tale of caution. Millard’s critical treatment of Roosevelt’s story focuses on the carelessness that went into planning, supplying, and organizing the expedition. Roosevelt prominently displays this carelessness, choosing not only the journey with the “greatest unforeseen difficulties” for himself and his men, but also by permitting unproven crewmembers to make crucial decisions without any oversight. Due to early physical problems in his childhood, Roosevelt embraced a “strenuous lifestyle” to overcome any obstacle through sheer will and determination. This unique outlook put others in harm’s way, including his own son, who accompanied Roosevelt strictly out of concern for his father’s health. The reader is given the impression that when Roosevelt confidently takes careless risks, he is displaying his most defining character trait. His risk-taking is evident throughout the book, from his failed 1912 political campaign (risking that voters would embrace the Progressive Party), to his parenting style (throwing his
Open Document