Language is defined to be a communication of thoughts and feelings through a system of random signals. These random signals could be voice sounds, gestures, or written symbols. Language does not only consist of voice sounds, but also encompasses body language and kinesics. Language consists of verbal language, body language, facial expressions, and sign language. Language and cognitive psychology phenomenon is that the new levels of cognitive psychology are reached and understood so should the levels of the different languages.
The second approach is the ‘intentional approach’, this type of approach occurs on contrary to the case, which links to representation. Basically, the ‘speaker or the author’ uses language as a tool to enforce their own distinct ‘meaning on the world through language. Words mean what the author intends they should mean.’ The final approach is the ‘constructionist approach’. This approach shows new knowledge, which comes from experience. When individuals incorporate, new understanding into an already existing framework without changing that framework.
Also as we are our own selves and cannot put ourselves in the shoes of someone else we can never really fully understand someone's actions. Symbolic interactionism focuses on small scale interactions rather than on the social structure. It looks at coming up with meanings through social interaction and
Words stand for ideas, people, events, objects, feelings, and so forth, but they are not the things they represent (Wood, p. 95, 96).” 2. How does your unique perspective influence how you perceive language? Communication reflects cultural values and perspectives. It also creates or reproduces culture by naming and normalizing practices valued by the culture. The words of a language reflect what the mainstream in a culture regards as worth naming.
Functionalism An important part of some accounts of functionalism is the idea of multiples reliability. Since, according to standard functionalist theories, mental states are the corresponding functional role, mental states can be sufficiently explained without taking into account the underlying physical medium e.g. the brain, neurons, etc. That realizes such states, one need only take into account the higher level functions in the cognitive system. Criticisms This perspective failed to clearly show how areas of conflict were addressed, as they emphasized agreement and people all having the same shared values (vale consensus).
They also focus on how human action is meaningful and can be interpreted by an observer. Therefore they take an opposite approach to structural theories and believe individuals have the ability to create society through choice, meaning and action. Symbolic interactionism is concerned with explaining social actions in terms of the meanings that people give to them. Interactions are based on meanings we give to situations. We express these meanings through symbols, especially language.
People cannot show the result of being or prejudice because people are known to select things that they are more familiar with, things that they are more commutable with, and things that they see in their everyday environment. This is just human nature so this is the reason why I say that it is hard to accurately measure
Behavior being the objective displays of behavior that we can see and measure from the outside. What cannot be measured from the outside, but is vital to our understanding of human behavior, is the human experience. In the science of persons, behavior is a "function of experience". Alienation from experience is a result of society's attempts to normalize the human experience. Our intentions, feelings, and imaginations are stripped down and mystified to being products of our upbringing, no longer coming from within, but controlled from the outside.
In the first chapter, he compares the idea of how truth exists in our world and how it exists in reality. Rorty explains how all languages are contingent. This is because only descriptions of the world can be true or false, and descriptions are made by humans who must make truth or falsity, as opposed to truth or falsity being determined by any innate property of the world being described. But in the real world the notion about the truth is that it is out there to be found. When we humans are reminded of this, they become skeptics in their conversation.
So there is a 'veil of perception' between the actual object and its representation. Between the perceiver and object, there is 'sense data'. It is the sense data that gives us the knowledge and understanding of the physical objects that surround us. Our sense data is an idea that gives us a representation of the world. In this essay I will look at the strengths and weaknesses of this belief, and come to conclusion on whether I think it's an ideology that should be taken seriously.