NCLB set forth a certain criteria to be met, but allowed the states to determine how they would accomplish it. Therefore, each state handles assessment and accountability differently. This makes it hard to show success or failure of the programs. Supporters and critics alike can cite research that supports their opinion. My opinion of NCLB is it is flawed, developmentally inappropriate, ill funded, ←and→ leaving more students, teachers, ←and→ schools behind than ever before because The tests have turned into the objective of classroom instruction rather than the measure of teaching ←and→ learning.
Persuasive essay Don’t Teach the Test Students all around the world are subjected into giving ‘standardized tests’ to evaluate their place in this world. Standardized tests have come to a point where they run the lives of students and teachers alike. The point here is to convey the misuse of today’s standardized testing and its impact on young minds. Standardized testing has come to be known as a “core issue in education” (Silverstein 1). Students are shown to have increased stress levels due to testing, for them it has become the ill fate of ‘all or nothing’.
NCLB was established so that students were not held back in a grade and were promoted to the next grade. I think this is a political aspect that is failing our students. If a student is not understanding the material or doesn’t pass the tests showing that they understand and can retain the information, I don’t believe that they should be promoted. I believe that it only hurts the students because they get more behind as they advance through the levels. The ethical issues that regard the high stakes testing is that it could be unfair to some students.
For many years, adults have send them the message success is more important than learning. A research shows that a “grading orientation” and a “learning orientation” can’t not be exist at the same time; this means if a student has a high “grading orientation” most likely that student will have a low “learning orientation” and vice versa. No contemporary researches have shown different result. “Assessment-based grading” or extrinsic motivation tends to diminish intrinsic motivation and by that Kohn means students only care whether if the materials will be on the test, but not “How do I know if that is true?”. Cheating, fear of failure are just some of the examples that existing in the graded-oriented environment.
It appears that testing is a waste of time, but in reality, it prepares students for future success. Another question that occurs is: What are students gaining from these different tests each year? Many people debate whether the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is considered to be pointless. Maybe these tests are teaching students accountability and responsibility, two vital tools for success in life. Within in the article, “No Child Left Behind: Test-Obsessed Education Won’t Move Us Ahead” the author, David Marshak, slashes the No Child Left Behind Act.
Your conclusion is that small class size indeed causes better grades. Wrong, because there is a fundamental problem with this conclusion; you did not account for 'intervening variables'! Could there be an intervening variable that is effecting this relationship between class size and student performance? Actually there can be many factors which are influencing this relationship. How about the influence of the teacher?
However, society has come to believe that the color red is harsh and can be demoralizing to students. Our growing politically correct society believes that using “kind colors,” such as purple, will place less stress on children. The general public believes that purple ink will spare kids from an unpleasant life. Papermate’s sales in purple pens have gone up ten percent, proving that the purple pen phenomenon is real (Smerconish
III. Body Paragraph 2 i. Cheating has become a problematic issue in America’s classrooms and most of the time the internet and high-tech gadgets are involved. j. When students generally cheat it is either on a final exam that determines their future or solely the fact that they weren’t prepared for the test (Koch).
As a result, children could fail their exam or could not find a job in the future. In addition, the author also argues that it is difficult to control children through texting. Children usually use the messages as codes to hide some things. As a result, parents hardly to understand and control their children. Both authors mention the using of abbreviations in messages.
Rote learning has different results in different cultures. Some cultures have ha improved test scores, where as some cultures test scores have suffered. Rote Learning is practiced in schools across India, Pakistan, China, Singapore, Japan, Romania and Greece. In many of these cultures test scores have either exceeded many other countries test scores, or they have scored much lower. A report from the United Nations, reports that rote learning is a major contributing factor to the lack of progress in science and research & development in the Arab countries.