The people to benefit from this attitude towards diversity were the Northern European ethnic immigrants. This created frustration for people of color as they could emulate how the white behavior but could not get past the issue of color. Melting Pot: in 1908 this perspective came into play. The melting pot perspective is one of which stating that settlers to America need not relinquish their entire racial or ethnic heritage but that all ethnic differences would balance into a dominant American culture. This idea “deemphasized differences and emphasizes instead the need to disregard diversity and accept immigrants as Americans as long as they learned to speak English and became citizens.
In conclusion, people should express their own personality and style without, being forced to convert to a new country’s national culture. Forcing an immigrant to change culture, language, and religion is against the 1st amendment and should not be broken based on our founding father’s laws. Forcing a non-resident to adapt to a new country is morally wrong and should not be allowed. Being an immigrant, this will be extremely hard on being unique. Even if someone is less fortunate and was born in a third world country, it doesn't make it any better if you force them to learn your culture and
According to King, it is impractical because it slows the process of ending the oppression for all, and it is immoral because it seeks humiliate the opponent rather than win his understanding. So, violence destroys community and brotherhood by planting hatred rather than love. The third way based on King is nonviolent resistance. He believes in this way no individual or group need give in to any wrong, nor need anyone resort to violence in order to right a wrong. According to king, this is the method that oppressed people must follow to win against the unjust system while loving the perpetrators of the system.
“We want a peace which will be just, but not vindictive. We want a stern peace because the occasion demands it, but severity must be designed, not for vengeance but for justice. Above all we want to protect the future against a repetition of the horrors of this war”. Woodrow Wilson’s aims were seen as building a better and more peaceful world from the ruins of the Great War. Wilson believed the treaty of Versailles should punish Germany but not so harshly that it would someday recover and seek revenge.
Milgram’s conclusion really advocates King’s belief, because the surprising conclusion of obedience to authority is what King does not believe to be the way of social relations. In the period of segregation, no one was doing anything even though they knew it was wrong because the government was the authority. So King opposes obedience based on his
The law against polygamy is a law based on morals. Countless people believe gay marriage is morally wrong however it is not illegal. It is merely frowned upon, nevertheless laws were not made on morals or things people do not approve of. Polygamy is something people believe is morally incorrect; even so it should not be against the
In this case, other nationals dream of an American dream and eventually find ways to get into the country in their quest for a better life. However, there should be no any justification to break the law. Consequently, every non-citizen seeking to get into the country should follow the various legal programs the government has in place to ensure non-citizens settle legally in the country and gain employment to better their lives. On the other hand, the failure to enforce the law strictly while helping citizens of other nations is against the tenets of the founding father of the country. In addition, these laws exist to protect the country from illegal immigrants who might pose a threat to the nation and its citizens.
What racial profiling does is not protect us, but I believe it endangers us more. If police, airport security or any other form of enforcement are looking for someone that “fits the profile”, they could be letting people, that may not necessarily “fit the profile,” walk right on by, when he or she could be an eminent danger. You can’t put a whole race, religion, or ethnic group into one big category and assume that they all are a threat. Everyone should be treated with equality, and not based on what their background is. I also think that racial profiling encourages hatred between races.
To start is their path for undocumented aliens to earn citizenship, as well as reforming insurance. This is the democratic promise of citizenship to those still struggling for freedom and how they will achieve it. Also from a democratic stand point the immigration laws of today do not reflect democratic values or serve security and plan on real reform. There is no solution in establishing a massive new status of second-class workers; that betrays values and hurts all working people. In defending the democratic point of view, undocumented immigrants with in our borders who clear a background check, work hard and pay taxes should have a path to earn full participation in
Thus, the illegal immigrants should be punished through deporting back to their native country if within the period of time the they are here, they have just being slack off or breaking the laws such as stealing, etc. Then, they have no reason to say that the US didn’t give them the chance to be its resident, but it’s just their own fault. Illegal immigration should be eliminated, but the immigrants themselves should be treated with more understanding, instead of negative reactions. If every country is great as US (a free country), then the issue would not even come up. Freedom is always something that everyone want to have, some have it, some do not.