Criminal law consists of bodies of regulations and rules that will specify and define the punishments for the wrong committed against society or the state. Criminal laws are enforced on state, federal, and local levels. Criminal laws are in place to maintain some type of standard of conduct more acceptable in society, and to safeguard society from criminals. The purpose of criminal laws is to set a no tolerance standard for criminal behavior, also meaning no crime committed will go unpunished thus an attempt to keep the community crime free and safe. When
The Geneva Conventions The Geneva Convention is the core of international humanitarian law and it tries to limit the effects and aftermath of war. The Geneva Convention protects people who do not have any part of the war or do not participate in the hostilities which includes prisoners of war, wounded troops and civilians. The Geneva Convention come with protocols which have been developed through time. Since the Geneva Convention is such a vital link to being civilized and having every country disciplined to it, it would then mean that if any of the protocols has been violated by someone that someone must then be sought, tried or extradited disregarding what nationality that person is to be as
The primary mission of the due process model is to protect innocent people from wrongful conviction. It is doubtful that many would argue against the fact that we must engage in significant efforts to protect those who may be falsely accused. However, many argue that while the due process model focuses upon the rights of the accused it ignores the rights of victims. due process model does not limit itself to the Fourth Amendment. The police must also consider the individual rights of the accused in respect to many of the individual rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
Hence the law of war presupposes that its violation is to be avoided through the control of operations of war by commanders who are to some extent responsible for their subordinates. Thus, for instance, when troops commit massacres and atrocities against the civilian population of occupied territory or against prisoners of war, the responsibility may rest not only with the actual perpetrators but also with the
Because of what happened in Darfur some manner of action should be taken to insure that the perpetrators of the genocide are punished, and that the people of Darfur and other parts of Sudan are kept safe. Even though the genocide is over, here are several other courses of action that can be taken to ensure that justice is served. First, the perpetrators of the genocide must be punished under international law by the International Criminal Court which is known as the ICC.. Secondly, something must be done to ensure that the Sudanese government or the Janjaweed does not attempt to attack the people of Darfur or other parts of Sudan. The top perpetrators are the violent Arab militia, the Janjaweed, and the Sudanese president, Omar al-Bashir.
What might justify over-riding a state’s right to sovereignty by intervening in a civil war? The concept of sovereignty is paramount in the debate to justify intervention. After failures in Bosnia and Rwanda, the international commission on intervention and state sovereignty created the responsibility to protect in 2001[1]. When a country is unable to protect its citizens from atrocities, the responsibility to protect is borne by the international community [1]. The responsibility to react is an integral element of the responsibility to protect framework.
The “due process” and the “crime control” models both have to follow a protocol, regulations, and laws as described by the United States Constitution. Regardless of the approach, it is followed either by “due process”, or by the crime control model, the laws and Amendments must ensure the same approach effectively and consistently (Zalman, 2008). Both models have other differences as well. For example, the “due process” model provides that law enforcement within the criminal justice system is important to ensuring appropriate justice within society. While the “crime control” model contemplates that, the criminal justice system has an adverse consequence and progressively stops the process of arresting people within the criminal justice system.
Criminal Procedure Policy Paper CJA/ 364 Criminal Procedure May 29, 2012 Criminal Procedure Policy Paper The role the criminal justice system plays in society is expansive. Criminal justice is designed to keep the public safe, to stop wrongdoing, to punish wrongdoers, and to provide order to society. Given this broad role there will be times when criminal justice will not perform all roles well. This means, of course, that criminal justice will often fail to meet public expectations. Ultimately, the needs people have for criminal justice mean that they believe the criminal justice system should be designed to pursue goals that fulfill
This is why I like the fourth amendment. In America, the police must have a reason or a document in order to search someone’s house or body. This amendment protects people from unfair laws and rules. In America, our freedom cannot be taken away without a trial when if there is reason to search a person. The Fourth Amendment states that: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
State and local law enforcement are designing anti and counter terrorism programs. B. Different laws are being made for domestic terrorism. C. Government put more stress on the domestic terrorism in U.S. 4. Citizens can also help in preventing the domestic terrorism from happening.