In Michael Moore’s film, “Sicko” he describes the corruption of America’s health care today while comparing it to the universal health care other countries such as France, England, and Canada are exercising. I am very glad Michael Moore produced this film because although it may not be fair to both sides, it is still very informative and sends out the message that health care companies here in America are making a healthy living a luxurious burden rather than a given necessity. The two articles criticizing his film made it a little clearer of the bias he took part in. I believe the first one, by Tom Charity, was from a more neutral stand point rather than a liberal side, like Michael Moore, or a conservative side, like I believe Stephen Hunter is on. Charity described the truth and the overall message that “Sicko” gave, which was that the “insurance companies are making a killing at their expense”, when in retrospect they are supposed to be saving lives.
The healthier they made their patients the bigger the bonus they would get. If hospital stays weren’t as expensive, doctors could be on call 24/7 for peoples’ needs as in doctors on wheels, and another idea making medicinal needs cheaper. 5. Compare and contrast for profit systems and not for profit systems. What are the pluses and minuses of each?
This is also invalid because it is better to pay taxes rather than over priced medical bills. The last con is that people will have a longer wait time. That is also invalid because the more people that visit the more of a demand there will be for Doctors. A universal health care system would extend care to all Americans regardless of social status or bank account. Health care has become extremely unaffordable for both businesses and individuals.
I knew we lived in a day where people do not really seem to care for one another, but I would have never dreamed it would have been that way in the healthcare system. Although watching Michael Moore’s film was heartbreaking, it was very well put together. His film is mainly about the American Health Care system as seen through Michael Moore’s own eyes. In the film, Moore compares the non-universal and for-profit U.S. system with public funded health care systems in Canada, United Kingdom, France and Cuba. Sicko focuses on the 250 million Americans who do not have health insurance and who have become victims of the insurance company’s fraud or being denied any kind of coverage for their medical conditions.
What is the business, political, and social impact of not digitizing medical records (for individual physicians, hospitals, insurers, patients, and the U.S. government)? Many smaller medical practices are finding it difficult to afford the costs and time commitment to upgrading their record keeping systems. EMR systems cost a lot from individual physicians and hospitals. Although stimulus money should eventually be enough to cover that cost, only a small amount of it is available up front. Small providers are less likely to have done any preparatory work digitizing their records compared to their larger counterparts.
Basically Socialized Medical systems are designed to eliminate the insurance industry and marginalize profit while providing health care for all. Socialized Medicine has been around for centuries, although not recognized as such, many people in America have given it a very negative connotation. Socialized medicine is too often associated with socialism and in America’s political arena it has long been rejected, thus an opportunity for a National Socialized Medicine program continues to be just a dream for those that believe in the idea (Ausman, 2007). Often people forget that America already supports socialized medicine to a small portion of its citizens. That is, the Veterans Administration’s health care services and the active duty and reserve military force are covered by a socialized medicine program.
The doctors are government employees making a set salary, and they receive a bonus for keeping their patients healthy. The hospitals compete to be the popular hospital to keep from being shut down (Reid, 2008). If Mr. Davis lived in Great Britain, he would receive exceptional care without the high medical bills. References: National Health Service (NHS) (2013). Get help with prescription costs .
Medical Expenses Barriers The United States lamentably is a Country, that doesn’t have a program designed to prevent their citizens from having to live without health care insurance. There are many reasons that contribute to being unable to obtain medical attention, but one of the most evident is the inability to afford health care insurance. Although there are both private and public insurances, the minority class tends to be trapped in the middle, and that is due to the fact that most of this population consists of people that are paid a minimal amount. According to Kendall (2008), “Despite
The Overlooked Connection between Social Needs and Good Health summary of findings from a survey of america’s physicians December 2011 health care’s blind side Summary of FINDINGS A national survey reveals that physicians believe unmet social needs are directly leading to worse health for Americans — and that patients’ social needs are as important to address as their medical conditions. Medical care alone cannot help people achieve and maintain good health if they do not have enough to eat, live in a dilapidated apartment without heat or are unemployed. Physicians report that their patients frequently express health concerns caused by unmet social needs beyond their control. This is health care’s blind side: Within the current
There has been many debates to weather doctors should be able to refuse lazy/old patients expensive treatments as they are not beating their habits, so why should doctors have to give these patients the treatment when they are not making the effort to get their body in a fitter, healthier state, and there is people out there desperate for surgery who have made the effort to be in shape and they can’t get the surgery because it is too expensive,but on the otherwise, why should these people have to suffer without help? In hospitals all over the world there are smokers, overweight people and alcoholics receiving the same treatment as other patients that are healthier and choose not to harm their bodies by using harmful substances, which I personally think is an absolute disgrace. As these people who abuse their bodies have the same “right” to these expensive treatments even though some of the substances they choose to eat, drink or inhale cause damage, disease and infections within the human body, and not enough is been done about it. People that work for the telegraph would agree as on their website it states "Smokers, heavy drinkers, the obese and the elderly should be barred from receiving some operations, according to doctors, with most saying the health service cannot afford to provide free care to everyone." - this information can be found on -http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1576704/Dont-treat-the-old-and-unhealthy-say-doctors.html Some doctors say old people may not be healthy enough to survive operations and could be life threatening and doctors are allowed to discriminate old people if they think they really need the operations to cure/help them, however the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) says "doctors must not discriminate against patients who have brought their illnesses upon themselves.