Often, an ethnocentric person may react to said situation as if every other culture is crazy and that only what they eat is completely normal. Then, you have others who are open-minded to these cultures that will accept these cultures and their traditions but just won’t do it. Cultural relativism is the principle that an individual human’s beliefs and activities should be understood by others in terms of that individual’s own culture. In other words, cultural relativism is when an individual person or group learns to accept the beliefs and traditions of another culture. Personally, I accept every culture, even if I don’t interact with them on a personal level.
From the point of view of Carol, she wanted help from Professor John in order to raise her grade (Oleanna 1). However, she misinterpreted Professor Johns help into sexual, verbal, and physical harassment (Mamet 1). Both professor and student have had their own fair share of misinterpretation, and this caused things to get out of hand quickly. Both characters could have done things, in order to make things simpler and easier for the other person to understand their point of view. Professor John could have taken into mind how his actions would affect Carol, and he could have taken into consideration the effects of his actions.
Epicureanism in contrast is a commitment to relish or pleasure; especially in regards to drinks and food. Virtue for Epicurus is seen as means to an end; end being perceived as happiness. According to Epicureanism, it is welcome to experience pleasure and neglect pain, but one must also exercise reason in life. At times pain is essential in order to achieve happiness, as in alternate circumstances pleasure leads to more misery than it is worth. In spite of their theoretical differences there are similarities between Stoicism and Epicureanism.
Now it is considered offensive and unusual, therefore deviant. It can be difficult to give a clear definition of deviance as a lot of it depends on people’s values and opinions. What one person views as deviant behaviour another may view as normal. Also deviant behaviour is not always bad; there is good and odd deviant behaviour. This makes it harder to define as classifying behaviour requires taking a moral standpoint and judging.
Ethical decisions are sometimes hard and difficult to make because doing the wrong thing is easier because you inconvenient others, put others last to satisfy your needs. When you have to make the right decision it inconveniences you and only helps the other person that is when it becomes a internal battle of ethics. Freedom of speech give us the rights as American citizens to speak freely, but at the same time there is a time, place, and audience to address certain topics too. You have to respect other people feeling, religious belief while utilizing the rights of free speech. After September 11, 2001 free speech had is challenges of whether the American people should hear about the plans that the government wanted to take too teach the terrorist a lesson.
Some may begrudge a colleague for doing a task a certain way because they think it is wrong but in another culture it is considered acceptable . Our life experiences have most likely affected the way we think about people and we all have our own personal like and dislikes too .All this can have a significant effect on how we think of things. It is unlikely that we can
Or I can just work hard, study, be honest, tell the truth, and stay out of trouble to be on the honor roll. Blind ambition also can lead you to be influenced by someone else into doing something against your values. If I have an 80 overall average, along with my friends. One of my friends can influence me to cheat, in order to get the 90 or 95 average if I have blind ambition. A key example of being influenced by someone against your values is in Macbeth.
Kent’s situation does consist of several ethical dilemmas as his accomplishments since joining Dura- Stick have been mediocre at best and he fears that his time at Dura-Stick might be limited unless he starts closing big accounts such as the project proposed from Spray-On. Bruce is also faced with the knowledge that there is a certain level of expectations placed upon him and his organisation as Spray-On has certain criteria’s that must be met for the ‘new project’. However, Kent accepted the project even thought Dura-Stick would be unable to meet the criteria that Spray-On desires. This ethical dilemma has arisen because Kent is conflicted by his morals and his sense
The problem with people not knowing how to respect boundaries can affect more than one person. It could be because of many different things. Maybe because of how they were brought up or because throughout life so many people have not respected your boundaries so know you have the wrong attitude. They don’t respect mine, so why should I respect theirs so now you don’t and have added to the problem. Instead of adding to your problems try fixing it.
Within the meaning of ethical relativism we can derive two theses: cultural relativism and the dependency thesis. Ethical relativism is a problematic theory because there are so many differences within cultures, and individual choices might not always be morally right choices. Because of this, what is culturally acceptable is not always morally right. Ethical relativism also has some objections towards the more specific theories of subjectivism and conventionalism. Ethical relativism is supported due to the narrowing view of ethnocentrism, which is causing great “prejudice tantamount to racism and sexism” (Pojman, 25).