The Parthenon & The Pantheon

449 Words2 Pages
The Parthenon vs. The Pantheon The Parthenon and Pantheon are both significant and creative structures that have great importance during their respective times. Perikles commissioned the architects Iktinos and Kallikrates to design the Parthenon in 447 BCE in the Acropolis of Athens in Greece. Although the Pantheon was designed and constructed entirely during the reign of the emperor Hadrian, the inscriptions states that It was built by Emperor Marcus Agrippa around 27 – 25 BCE in Rome. They both come from two different cultures and times but show many similarities in their overall symbolism and meaning. Each temple is a good example of Greek and Roman architecture respectively. One of the most notable differences between the two is their construction. While both illustrate geometric precision, they are stylistically different. The Parthenon a temple built for the Greek Goddess Athena the Maiden, best known as The Goddess of Wisdom; it is the most important surviving building of Classical Greece, generally considered the culmination of the development of the Doric order. The Parthenon is a Doric style temple consisting of a rectangular floor, with several low steps and eight Doric style columns on each side (front and back). It is also characteristically thicker and more rectangular than the Pantheon with its oblong rooms and proportions. The cultural monument is made entirely from marble, with a limestone base. The Pantheon is the best preserved of all Roman buildings, and perhaps the best-preserved building of its age in the world. It has a few resembling features to the Parthenon but is overall much different. Like the Parthenon, in the front it has eight columns and a pediment (characteristic of Greek temples). It is very sharp and clean. However, the columns are Corinthian style, and in the back, there lies a massive, hemispherical dome. The Romans also

More about The Parthenon & The Pantheon

Open Document