The Omnivores Dilemma

2112 Words9 Pages
Reflective Paper “The Omnivores Dilemma” Bio 131 Nutrition Steven Hanbury Response to question 1: “Omnivore’s Dilemma” is a term coined by Paul Rozin, a University of Pennsylvania research psychologist to describe how omnivores or a species that consumes both meat and vegetation can differentiate between what is good and what is bad, given the high amount of variety afforded them. As humans, we begin life as omnivores, (some make a conscious decision to become vegetarians later in life). We are offered a great many choices when we shop for food. The dilemma we face is that, although we do not purposely buy poison for our families to eat we must take great care in knowing how our food is prepared, or processed. What man made, or natural products are in the food we consume that may hurt us later in life? The term omnivore certainly applies to my diet, although my particular diet certainly lacks on the vegetable side of the ledger. When I consider the terms carnivore and herbivore, I tend to think in terms of the animal kingdom. The Lion is a carnivore who kills and eats the Water Buffalo who is a herbivore, or grass eater. There seems to be a social hierarchy, the meat eater are the kings the grass eaters are the pheasants. Although I am a true omnivore, by eating both meat and vegetables, I have never used the term to describe myself. Response to question 2: The French paradox refers to the fact that the French eat meals that are high in fat, and have the ever present glass of wine with seemingly every meal, and still seem to remain slim and healthy. The American paradox is nearly the opposite, Americans who seem unhealthy, are obsessed with eating healthy. Obviously, there are both American and French who eat healthy, and unhealthy. There obese French and obese Americans. The major factor that is not revealed in the French paradox is

More about The Omnivores Dilemma

Open Document