The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant and an Alpine Divorce

1856 Words8 Pages
The Necklace by Guy de Maupassant and An Alpine Divorce by Robert Barr are two short stories both set in the 19th century and both show a realistic understanding of marriage. In this essay I will be exploring these stories, comparing the two situations, explaining why the ideas of Victorian marriage are so different to those of ours today and also exploring the expectations and roles of women at this time. The Necklace is a short story written by Guy de Maupassant who knew exactly what it was like to experience a life of relative wealth and luxury and then to suddenly become poor. The story shows this and is undoubtedly loosely based on the authors own experiences. The protagonist, Madame Loisel is a, ‘pretty and charming girl,’ we are told who, ‘as she has no dowry or inheritance marries a junior clerk in the Ministry of Public Instruction.’ The story is based around her and the fact that she feels she has married beneath herself, something many people (women especially) of this time would have sympathised with and understood. Mathilde Loisel’s husband manages to get her an invitation to an exclusive ball and she get a new dress and borrows a diamond necklace for the occasion. After having a wonderful evening at the ball Mathilde returns home to find that at some point during the evening she has lost the necklace and it cannot be found anywhere. Mathilde and Loisel then spend the rest of their lives trying to repay the debt they accumulated while trying to replace the necklace. Ironically the necklace was a fake and all their hard work was for nothing. Being a strong campaigner for the divorce laws to be changed and also the role which women played in Victorian marriage, Robert Barr’s work often reflected his beliefs. An Alpine Divorce is an example of this. Mr and Mrs Bodman seem from the outset a well off, contented couple. However a holiday in
Open Document